EFTA Document EFTA02134200

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 10

Reference

efta-efta02134200

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Download Original PDF

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

To: William Murphy Cc: Jermaine Ruan Rich Kah From: Lesley Groff Sent: Mon 7/1/2013 3:22:53 PM Subject: Re: Catalyst 3560 We looked and there are 2 back up batteries and cords only...we are wondering if the back up batteries and cords should go to STC...please let us know... On Jul 1, 2013, at 11:16 AM, William Murphy wrote: > There may be another in the box in front of the rack as well. > • On Jul 1, 2013, at 10:20 AM, "Jermaine Ruan" wrote: » Hi Lesley, >> >> If the marking after the " Catalyst 3560" says POE I can use it, as long as >> it's not a spare unit for HBRK. If it is a spare, I got an email from Sue >> stating that one was ordered. » Regards, » Jruan >> >> Original Message » From: Lesley Groff » Sent: Monday, July (PIFIRI FIN » To: Jermaine Ruan » Cc: Rich Kahn; bill murphy » Subject: Catalyst 3560 >> >> Hi jermaine! Please see picture! This looks a bit different from what you » sent me but it states it is a Catalyst 3560. Is this what you want? I will >> send with tomorrow! >> Hi Roy >> I could not find the Cisco catalyst anywhere in stock in New York. I have » ordered it online and it should arrive Tuesday morning in St Thomas. » Best » Sue » Sent from my iPhone-, EFTA_R1_00781432 EFTA02134200

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02159053

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02076010

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01964749

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02031872

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.