Skip to main content
Skip to content
EFTA Document EFTA02183031EFTA Document EFTA02183033
Case File
efta-efta02183032DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA02183032

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta02183032
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Download Original PDF
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: From: Bill Richardson Sent Fri 9/16/2011 3:07:37 AM Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein will be in touch. In ny weds thurs and fri. What is best for jeffrey. On 9/13/11, wrote: > Hello Governor R c ar son. Je rey is won ering what your schedule is like > > next week while in NY...Jeffrey will be in NY as well and would love together if at all possible. to get > Please let me know if you might have some free time available. > Thank you, Sent from my mobile device www.billrichardson.com EFTA_R1_00875284 EFTA02183032

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01818731

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02572024

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01374407

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01831683

0p
OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.