Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta02192092DOJ Data Set 10Correspondence

EFTA Document EFTA02192092

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta02192092
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Lesley Groffampumpai From: Jabor Y. Sent Fri 11/4/2016 11:53:41 AM Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Invitation Sony, we are off today. Give us half an hour and we shall send this invitation. On Friday, November 4, 2016, Lesley Groff < wrote: Hello Jabor...can you please help with the below? thank you Lesley Begin forwarded message: From: Dave Rodgers .a> Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Invitation Date: November 4, 2016 at 6:30:50 AM EDT To: Lesley Groff <1 .. Hello Jabor: I'm Jeffrey Epstein's pilot and I am trying to confirm if you were able to send an Invitation for Jeffrey to the CAA in order that we can get landing permission at Doha. If you are not aware of this, email me back and I will send you the information you need for the Invitation to the CAA. If you hinnimh My mobile number is I - Best Regards, Dave Rodgers N212JE JEGE LLC e CAA, could you email a copy of that request to EFTA_R1_00892456 EFTA02192092

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2192092
Tail #N212JE

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex‑parte communications, and leaks to the press—while naming senior DOJ officials (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marie Villafana and Jeffrey Sloman) and linking the case to former President Bill Clinton’s notoriety. These allegations, if substantiated, could expose abuse of prosecutorial discretion, potential violations of DOJ ethics rules, and political influence, making it a strong investigative lead. However, much of the material is defensive in nature and repeats known procedural complaints, limiting its novelty and concrete evidentiary hooks. Key insights: Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was signed (July 1 2008 subpoena).; Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked information to reporter Landon Thomas.; Accusations that Villafana attempted to appoint a personal friend of her live‑in boyfriend as attorney‑representative for victims, suggesting a conflict of interest.

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02327644

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02326979

2p
OtherUnknown

NAME SEARCHED: Jeffrey Epstein

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01296720

114p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA00326975

2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA02138768

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.