Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta02730473DOJ Data Set 12Correspondence

EFTA02730473

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 12
Reference
efta-efta02730473
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Subject: To: Sent: April 24, 2013 4:32 PM (UTC-04:00) Attached: Field Office Request Form.doc Classification: UNCLASSIFIED FW: RE: 31E-MM-108062 --- UNCLASSIFIED Below is the form that you need to print out. Just fill out the bottom portion and sign. Make sure to put the signed form in the box with the files. I always send a courtesy email to the recipient to give them a heads up about what is coming and how much. Thanks a billion, for helping me out with this. Thank you, Admin. Specialist Records :Management/ Closed fifes Miami Division Have a Sentinel question? Check out Miami's discussion board: : SENTINEL Discussion Board — Miami Users From: Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 11:57 AM To: Subject: FW: RE: 31E-MM-108062 --- UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED TRANSITORY RECORD Ms I need to request the file above in order to respond to a Freedom of Information Act litigation. As you can see in the emails below the case agent has approved the processing of this file by RMD with division review. Please forward all available portions of this file to me here in Winchester VA. I have attached the FO request form below. EFTA02730473 Thank you, Legal Administrative Specialist RIDS/FOIPA Unit 4 Records Management Division From• Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:53 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: RE: 31E-MM-108062 --- UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED That's fine if we'll have time to review before release. We only have a couple of other directions to follow up on and it is related to developing a separate subject involved with Epstein. By the time the FOIA processing is completed we should have those outstanding leads resolved. Thanks. From: Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:42 AM To: Subject: FW: RE: 31E-MM-108062 UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED The attorney for OIP who made the initial inquiry regarding this case sent me an email informing me that she will recommend overturning the 'B7A' exemption for this file (and thus making it subject to FOIA processing) if she does not receive a 'harm rationale" today. In the event the file is processed it would still be available for division review (Miami, Tampa, or both) of RMD's proposed redactions before any release was made. EFTA02730474 From• Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:40 AM To: Subject: RE: RE: 31E-MM-108062 UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED OIP is now telling me they need an articulation of harm in regards to processing the file for FOIA. If you could provide that (such as: it would discourage witnesses, hamper the gathering of leads, endanger informants, etc.) that would be great. Otherwise please let me know who I can contact in Tampa who might be able to help. Thanks, From: Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:35 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: RE: 31E-MM-108062 --- UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED H Associate Deputy Attorney Genera approved the office wide recusal of the United States Attorneys Office (USAO) for the Southern District of Florida from the investigation and assigned the matter to the USAO for the Middle District of Florida. Investigation is ongoing. From• Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 2:52 PM To: Subject: RE: 31E-MM-108062 --- UNCLASSIFIED EFTA02730475 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED St This is in regards to Jeffrey Epstein, a main subject of the file above. Mr. Epstein has made three Freedom of Information Act requests for his FBI file since 2010 and has appealed our latest denial in December 2012 to Dors Office of Information Policy. As such I am required to verify that the case remains pending. For RMD to be able to deny processing the file there must be potential prosecutive action remaining, such as continuing appeals, rather than simply remaining pending awaiting destruction of evidence. Thanks, Legal Administrative Specialist RIDS/FOIPA Unit 4 Records Management Division Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Classification: UNCLASSIFIED EFTA02730476

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.