Professor Dershowitz seeks limited intervention in Jane Doe #3 case, citing Epstein's Fifth Amendment invocations

Professor Dershowitz seeks limited intervention in Jane Doe #3 case, citing Epstein's Fifth Amendment invocations The passage provides a concrete procedural lead—Dershowitz’s motion to intervene and references to Epstein’s Fifth Amendment claims—but offers no new factual allegations, financial data, or direct ties to high‑level officials. It is useful for tracking litigation strategy and potential witness testimony, yet the content is largely legal argumentation without novel revelations. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a Motion for Limited Intervention six days after Jane Doe #3’s motion for joinder.; The argument hinges on Epstein’s broad Fifth Amendment refusals, suggesting no specific inference against Dershowitz.; Reference to a prior case (Coguina Investments v. TD Bank) to limit adverse inference from third‑party Fifth Amendment claims.