Government delays and objections to adding [REDACTED - Survivor] as a victim in Edwards v. Dershowitz case
Government delays and objections to adding [REDACTED - Survivor] as a victim in Edwards v. Dershowitz case The passage reveals that the Justice Department (or other government counsel) stalled and ultimately opposed the addition of a high‑profile alleged victim ([REDACTED - Survivor]) to a civil suit involving a prominent attorney. While it suggests possible government interference or selective privilege claims, it lacks concrete details on motives, higher‑level officials, or financial transactions, limiting its investigative immediacy. Nonetheless, the involvement of a well‑known figure and the pattern of sealed documents merit further follow‑up. Key insights: Government produced 1,500 pages of irrelevant material while sealing 14,825 pages as privileged.; Victims’ counsel sought to add [REDACTED - Survivor] (Jane Doe No. 3) via stipulation to avoid detailed abuse facts.; Government delayed response for four months and then objected without providing a reason.
Summary
Government delays and objections to adding [REDACTED - Survivor] as a victim in Edwards v. Dershowitz case The passage reveals that the Justice Department (or other government counsel) stalled and ultimately opposed the addition of a high‑profile alleged victim ([REDACTED - Survivor]) to a civil suit involving a prominent attorney. While it suggests possible government interference or selective privilege claims, it lacks concrete details on motives, higher‑level officials, or financial transactions, limiting its investigative immediacy. Nonetheless, the involvement of a well‑known figure and the pattern of sealed documents merit further follow‑up. Key insights: Government produced 1,500 pages of irrelevant material while sealing 14,825 pages as privileged.; Victims’ counsel sought to add [REDACTED - Survivor] (Jane Doe No. 3) via stipulation to avoid detailed abuse facts.; Government delayed response for four months and then objected without providing a reason.
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM
EFTA01308033
EFTA Document EFTA01695623
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.