Deposition excerpt shows lawyers debating privilege over alleged minor‑related allegations

Deposition excerpt shows lawyers debating privilege over alleged minor‑related allegations The passage contains a fragmented deposition transcript where counsel argue about the factual basis and privilege of allegations involving minors. It mentions only lower‑level attorneys and a judge (Judge Marra) without linking any high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or foreign actors. The lead is vague, lacks concrete details, and offers little actionable investigative direction. Key insights: Lawyers dispute whether the witness can disclose the factual basis for allegations involving other minors.; Repeated references to attorney‑client privilege and attempts to strike or limit questions.; Judge Marra is mentioned as the presiding judge who might hear the testimony.