Deposition reveals repeated privilege objections to questions about [REDACTED - Survivor]' allegations against Professor Alan Dershowitz and possible communications with attorney Bob Josefsberg

Deposition reveals repeated privilege objections to questions about [REDACTED - Survivor]' allegations against Professor Alan Dershowitz and possible communications with attorney Bob Josefsberg The transcript shows attorneys repeatedly invoking common‑interest and attorney‑client privilege to block inquiries about whether anyone disclosed Roberts' allegations to Bob Josefsberg. While it does not provide concrete evidence of wrongdoing, it flags a potentially sensitive communication chain involving a high‑profile law professor and a private‑practice attorney, suggesting a line of inquiry for investigators. Key insights: Multiple objections cite common‑interest privilege, indicating the parties consider the matter sensitive.; Questions focus on whether anyone told the witness that Roberts' allegations were discussed with Bob Josefsberg.; The witness (presumably Professor Cassell) claims no knowledge of such communications within Josefsberg's firm.