Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Secret Service FOIA denial on Clinton travel records to Little St. James IslandSecret Service FOIA denial on Clinton travel records to Little St. James Island
Secret Service FOIA denial on Clinton travel records to Little St. James Island The document reveals a formal FOIA request for Secret Service shift logs and travel itineraries linking former President Bill Clinton to Little St. James Island, a location tied to high‑profile controversy. While the agency reports no records in its indices, the very existence of the request and the denial suggest possible undisclosed material, offering a concrete follow‑up avenue (appeal, further records search). However, the letter provides no new specifics, dates, or transactions, limiting its immediacy. Key insights: FOIA request filed on April 16, 2015 for Secret Service records of Clinton's travel to Little St. James Island.; USSS response states no records found in main indices, but does not confirm records do not exist.; Appeal process is outlined, offering a procedural path to potentially obtain the documents.
Summary
Secret Service FOIA denial on Clinton travel records to Little St. James Island The document reveals a formal FOIA request for Secret Service shift logs and travel itineraries linking former President Bill Clinton to Little St. James Island, a location tied to high‑profile controversy. While the agency reports no records in its indices, the very existence of the request and the denial suggest possible undisclosed material, offering a concrete follow‑up avenue (appeal, further records search). However, the letter provides no new specifics, dates, or transactions, limiting its immediacy. Key insights: FOIA request filed on April 16, 2015 for Secret Service records of Clinton's travel to Little St. James Island.; USSS response states no records found in main indices, but does not confirm records do not exist.; Appeal process is outlined, offering a procedural path to potentially obtain the documents.
Tags
Related Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01385042
EFTA02680554
Email chain referencing alleged Jeffrey Epstein encounter and a purported Clinton dinner
The passage contains vague, unverified claims linking Jeffrey Epstein to a dinner with former President Bill Clinton, but provides no concrete dates, transaction details, or verifiable evidence. It su Alleged dinner with President Clinton on a Caribbean island, allegedly arriving by black helicopter. Claims the writer met Jeffrey Epstein as an adult and denies being his "sex slave". Reference to m
Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM
Compilation of public links referencing Jeffrey Epstein and associated personalities
The passage merely aggregates publicly available web links and generic descriptions about Jeffrey Epstein, his foundation, and his alleged connections. It provides no new factual leads, specific trans List of URLs to Wikipedia, news articles, and promotional sites about Epstein. Mentions of known associates such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Leslie Wexne References to Epste
Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein
Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, former President Bill Clinton) that could be pursued for further investigation. It includes specific dates, subpoena details, and names of attorneys, offering concrete leads, but the claims are largely unverified and rely on the law firm’s advocacy, limiting its immediate explosiveness. Key insights: Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Roth.; Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Epstein.; Alleges misconduct by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Villafana and Sloman, including alleged self‑dealing and conflict‑of‑interest.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.