Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-010972House Oversight

Chapter on Economic Foundations Lacks Direct Links to Influential Actors

Chapter on Economic Foundations Lacks Direct Links to Influential Actors The passage discusses theoretical foundations of economics and teaching methodology without mentioning any specific individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or controversial actions. It provides no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Focuses on historical development of economic theory and marginalist revolution.; Emphasizes need for explicit axioms in economics.; No mention of political figures, agencies, or financial flows.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-010972
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Chapter on Economic Foundations Lacks Direct Links to Influential Actors The passage discusses theoretical foundations of economics and teaching methodology without mentioning any specific individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or controversial actions. It provides no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Focuses on historical development of economic theory and marginalist revolution.; Emphasizes need for explicit axioms in economics.; No mention of political figures, agencies, or financial flows.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighteconomicstheoryeducationfoundations

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
CHAPTER 3: FOUNDATIONS Historically, foundations and science itself emerge at the end of centuries of practical application. A logical place for foundations in textbooks is the beginning. So it was with Halliday and Resnick on physics, which began with Newton’s kinetics (motion in time and space) and then this three laws. Only in the last chapter did the authors remind us that Einstein later put two of these three into question, and even the kinetics. Halliday and Resnick reasoned, correctly | think, that we sometimes learn more efficiently by learning something slightly wrong first and fixing it later. | will do that, in a sense, by reasoning first through free growth theory as if the Y=C + ] equation were true, and then again with the two corrections. The sometimes counterintuitive logic of teaching and learning, including that, is “heuristics”. Building on explicit axioms was common in economics throughout the classical period running from Petty in the 17" century through Mill in the 19th. Then came the major shift in focus, beginning in 1871, called the marginalist revolution. What mattered was less our goals, and more the market mechanisms that aligned supply, demand and price. The meeting point was the margin. Axioms about goals disappeared, including the usual one of prioritizing survival and reproduction, and axioms kept were usually left implicit. The implicit ones, essential to marginalism in my view, included convergent tastes and predictions. I will make those two and others explicit, and eventually add back the goals. This book on the whole is about second-guessing what is taught. This chapter is different. The nearest thing to a surprise in itis the idea that economics needs explicit foundations in the sense of axioms and basic definitions and equations. All the ones | choose are well accepted. Why | pick which should seem obvious in hindsight. But some mini-surprises will accumulate. Why do I take such pains to prove every feature of what everyone accepts already? Why all the boilerplate and bulletproofing? I need them because I will later try to shoot down other beliefs everyone accepts. We must know what is sound to find what is not. Chapter 3: Foundations 1/11/16 1

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeFinancial RecordUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01268612

HUD Settlement Statement Signatures We, the undersigned, identified in Section D hereof and Seller in Section E hereof, hereby acknowledge receipt of this completed Settlement Statement on December 13, 2019. The HUD-1 Settlement Statement which I have prepared is a true and accurate account of this transaction. I have caused or will cause the funds to be disbursed in accordance with this statement. Borrower(s) Granite Reality LLC, By: Jeffrey W. Roberts, Manager Seller(s) Richard Yospin

14p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightUnknown

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The provided file contains only a title and no substantive text, offering no names, transactions, dates, or allegations to pursue. Consequently, it provides no investigative leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkages. Key insights: Document contains only a header and filename.; No mention of individuals, agencies, or actions.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Fragmentary Text Mentions ‘Cacioppo’, ‘Nusbaum’, and ‘Chicago Social Brain Network’ in Unclear Context

Fragmentary Text Mentions ‘Cacioppo’, ‘Nusbaum’, and ‘Chicago Social Brain Network’ in Unclear Context The passage consists largely of incoherent fragments with no clear factual allegations, dates, transactions, or identifiable misconduct. It only loosely references a few names (Cacioppo, Nusbaum) and an organization (Chicago Social Brain Network) without any substantive connection to wrongdoing or power structures, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Mentions a possible individual named Cacioppo.; Mentions a possible individual named Nusbaum.; References the Chicago Social Brain Network and a publication titled “Invisible Forces and Powerful Beliefs”.

1p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightFeb 26, 2019

Cowen CBD Market Outlook Report – No Evident Investigative Leads

Cowen CBD Market Outlook Report – No Evident Investigative Leads The document is a commercial research note on CBD market size and analyst ratings, containing no references to political figures, financial misconduct, or intelligence activities. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Provides market size estimate for U.S. CBD ($16 bn by 2025).; Cites a proprietary survey showing 7% adult usage.; Mentions analyst ratings for WEED, TLRY, TPB.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.