Defense argues inability to depose Louie Freeh on alleged Epstein travel, citing sealed court order

Defense argues inability to depose Louie Freeh on alleged Epstein travel, citing sealed court order The passage reveals a procedural dispute over a sealed order that prevented the defense from deposing a key witness (Louie Freeh) regarding alleged travel with Jeffrey Epstein. It suggests a potential lead on undisclosed evidence and the use of expert testimony to assert the witness’s absence, which could be relevant to ongoing investigations of Epstein’s network. While not a direct new allegation, it points to a concrete legal hurdle and a possible avenue for further discovery. Key insights: Defense claims a sealed order (264-1) barred deposition of Louie Freeh, an alleged expert witness.; Freeh is said to have flown with Jeffrey Epstein 19 times internationally and nationally.; The case involves allegations unrelated to sexual abuse, but the evidence could be prejudicial if introduced without oath.