Defense argues FOIA letter and Prince Andrew references should be excluded from trial evidence

Defense argues FOIA letter and Prince Andrew references should be excluded from trial evidence The passage hints at potential suppression of records that could implicate a former president and a British royal in a criminal matter, suggesting a possible cover‑up or selective evidence handling. However, it lacks concrete details-no dates, transactions, or specific allegations-so the lead is moderate rather than blockbuster. Key insights: FOIA request for records dating back 15 years was denied, with the agency claiming routine record destruction.; Defense claims the missing records could prove a witness’s presence on an island with a high‑profile individual.; Reference to Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace denial suggests possible foreign royal involvement in the case.