Defense argues exclusion of tax‑compliance evidence for Giuffre's nonprofit in defamation case

Defense argues exclusion of tax‑compliance evidence for Giuffre's nonprofit in defamation case The passage merely cites procedural arguments about evidentiary rules and the tax status of a victim‑advocacy nonprofit. It contains no concrete leads, financial figures, dates, or connections to high‑ranking officials, making it low‑value for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Defense seeks to block evidence on the tax compliance of Victims Refuse Silence, a nonprofit run by Ms. Giuffre.; Cites Federal Rules of Evidence (Rule 401, 403) to argue prejudice outweighs probative value.; Mentions that the nonprofit is tax‑compliant, but the defendant does not acknowledge this in briefing.