Court filing argues exclusion of Giuffre's medical records and age testimony in sexual abuse case

Court filing argues exclusion of Giuffre's medical records and age testimony in sexual abuse case The passage outlines routine procedural arguments about evidentiary admissibility in a high‑profile sexual‑abuse lawsuit. It mentions no new facts, financial flows, or direct involvement of powerful officials, limiting its investigative value. Key insights: Defense argues medical records are irrelevant and lack precedent for admission.; Prosecution seeks to prevent the defense from suggesting Giuffre’s age makes her a ‘fair game.’; Reference to Florida law prohibiting consent for anyone under 18.