Court filing references Prince Andrew denial and Buckingham Palace statement in defamation case

Court filing references Prince Andrew denial and Buckingham Palace statement in defamation case The passage mentions high‑profile figures (Prince Andrew, Buckingham Palace) but only in the context of a routine evidentiary argument in a defamation lawsuit. It provides no concrete new allegations, financial transactions, or actionable leads, and the information appears to be standard legal argument rather than a novel revelation. Key insights: Defense seeks to admit an FBI 302 motion as evidence, claiming authenticity but lacking chain‑of‑custody details.; Plaintiff cites Prince Andrew’s denial of [REDACTED - Survivor]’ claims and a Buckingham Palace statement as widespread rumors to mitigate defamation damages.; Reference to a FOIA request requester testifying about what was requested and received.