Court transcript excerpt discussing admissibility of sexual assault and drug evidence

Summary

Court transcript excerpt discussing admissibility of sexual assault and drug evidence The passage provides a routine courtroom argument about evidentiary issues with no specific names, dates, transactions, or novel allegations involving powerful actors. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming standard procedural disputes. Key insights: Defense challenges admissibility of prior sexual assault evidence.; Accusations of 'doctor shopping' are addressed and disputed.; Reference to prescription records as evidence of medication usage.