Court denies motion to allow testimony on consensual adult sexual activities in House Oversight case

Court denies motion to allow testimony on consensual adult sexual activities in House Oversight case The passage merely records a routine procedural exchange in a court hearing, mentioning no high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or substantive allegations. It offers no concrete leads for further investigation beyond the existence of a motion, which is already public record. Key insights: Judge denies request to discuss consensual adult sexual activity of a client.; Motion number 665 referenced in the brief.; Involves attorneys Ms. Menninger and an unnamed client (Ms. Maxwell).