Courtroom transcript shows scheduling discussion, no substantive allegationsCourt hearing on procedural motions with no substantive allegations
Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Court scheduling discussion with Ms. McCawley and Mr. PagliucaCase Filekaggle-ho-011459House OversightCourt scheduling discussion with Ms. McCawley and Mr. Pagliuca
Unknown1p1 persons
Case File
kaggle-ho-011459House OversightCourt scheduling discussion with Ms. McCawley and Mr. Pagliuca
Court scheduling discussion with Ms. McCawley and Mr. Pagliuca The excerpt only details procedural scheduling of a hearing and a deposition conflict, with no substantive allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Ms. McCawley references a forensic review ordered on November 2nd.; Potential hearing dates discussed: April 10th, 12th, and 19th.; Mr. Pagliuca cannot attend on the 10th due to a deposition in Colorado.
Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-011459
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.