Draft peace‑proposal questions to Arafat discussed by senior US officials, revealing contested concessions on Jerusalem and right‑of‑return

Draft peace‑proposal questions to Arafat discussed by senior US officials, revealing contested concessions on Jerusalem and right‑of‑return The passage provides a concrete glimpse of internal US diplomatic deliberations on a peace framework, naming President Clinton, senior aides (Shlomo, Gili), and the Israeli‑Palestinian leadership. It offers specific policy points (Jerusalem sovereignty split, limited right‑of‑return, security zone duration) that could be cross‑checked with other records, but it lacks direct evidence of wrongdoing or illegal financial flows. The lead is moderately useful for investigating the evolution of US peace‑process strategy and possible political pressure on the President. Key insights: Clinton received a draft list of questions for Arafat outlining detailed territorial compromises.; The proposal included a split Jerusalem sovereignty, limited Palestinian control of the West Bank, and a restricted right‑of‑return limited to a future Palestinian state.; US officials debated security‑zone length (12 years vs. earlier 30‑year proposal).