Document alleges falsehoods in search warrant affidavit and disputes Jeffrey Epstein's use of interstate facilities for illegal sexual persuasion

Summary

Document alleges falsehoods in search warrant affidavit and disputes Jeffrey Epstein's use of interstate facilities for illegal sexual persuasion The passage provides a legal argument that a search warrant was based on material misrepresentations and claims that Jeffrey Epstein did not use interstate communications to solicit minors. It names specific statutes and case law, offering a potential lead to examine the affidavit, the underlying evidence, and any communications records. However, it lacks concrete new evidence, dates, or financial details, limiting its immediate investigative value. Key insights: Claims the search warrant affidavit contained false or omitted material facts.; References 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) and case law on intent to target minors.; Alleges Epstein and his assistants never used the Internet or phone to persuade a minor.