Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Deposition excerpt showing contested attorney‑client privilege claimsDeposition excerpt showing contested attorney‑client privilege claims
Deposition excerpt showing contested attorney‑client privilege claims The passage records a routine deposition dispute over privilege and mentions a lawyer (Jeffrey Herman) filing a lawsuit, but provides no concrete details about transactions, high‑level officials, or wrongdoing. It lacks actionable leads, novelty, or links to powerful actors. Key insights: Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of missing a hearing and obstructing the deposition.; Reference to a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filing a lawsuit on the witness’s behalf.; Debate over whether attorney‑client privilege applies to conversations with a Miami attorney.
Summary
Deposition excerpt showing contested attorney‑client privilege claims The passage records a routine deposition dispute over privilege and mentions a lawyer (Jeffrey Herman) filing a lawsuit, but provides no concrete details about transactions, high‑level officials, or wrongdoing. It lacks actionable leads, novelty, or links to powerful actors. Key insights: Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of missing a hearing and obstructing the deposition.; Reference to a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filing a lawsuit on the witness’s behalf.; Debate over whether attorney‑client privilege applies to conversations with a Miami attorney.
Tags
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.