Skip to main content
Skip to content
House Oversight hearing excerpt reveals possible undisclosed cell phone evidence and questions about financial ties to Jeffrey EpsteinIncoherent Deposition Transcript with No Clear Leads

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Deposition excerpt showing attorney objections to questions about witness Saige's alleged false statements
Case File
kaggle-ho-012441House Oversight

Deposition excerpt showing attorney objections to questions about witness Saige's alleged false statements

Deposition excerpt showing attorney objections to questions about witness Saige's alleged false statements The passage provides a narrow view of a courtroom exchange with no named high‑profile officials, financial details, or foreign actors. It suggests a possible dispute over a witness’s testimony but lacks concrete leads, dates, or actionable information for further investigation. Key insights: Attorney Mr. Tein questions witness Saige about alleged lies to avoid deposition and subpoena.; Attorney Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the form of the questions, citing lack of foundation.; The witness denies lying and says she is willing to testify.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-012441
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Deposition excerpt showing attorney objections to questions about witness Saige's alleged false statements The passage provides a narrow view of a courtroom exchange with no named high‑profile officials, financial details, or foreign actors. It suggests a possible dispute over a witness’s testimony but lacks concrete leads, dates, or actionable information for further investigation. Key insights: Attorney Mr. Tein questions witness Saige about alleged lies to avoid deposition and subpoena.; Attorney Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the form of the questions, citing lack of foundation.; The witness denies lying and says she is willing to testify.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightcourtroom-transcriptwitness-testimonylegal-procedureobjections
View on oversight.house.gov

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 —_ oro Oo Oa NN OD oO Fe WwW NY ~0929104. TXT answer the question, because any of those conversations involve her counsel. MR. TEIN: Certify that. MR. LEOPOLD: Please. BY MR. TEIN: Q. Now, Saige, you lied to get out of this deposition, didn't you? 54 A. No, sir. Q. You didn't want to come to court today and tell the story that you had told to the police under oath, did you? MR. LEOPOLD: Object to the form of the question. Lack of foundation, predicate. THE WITNESS: No. | have no problem coming here and talking to you. BY MR. TEIN: Q. And to avoid getting served with a lawful subpoena, you lied about your name, didn't you? A. No. Q. And in fact, just lying yourself wasn't enough, was it? MR. LEOPOLD: Objects to the form of the question. Don't answer it. It's not a question. Object to the form of the question. Lack of foundation. MR. TEIN: Are you instructing her not to answer? MR. LEOPOLD: | am. Page 46

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.