Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Deposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight HearingDeposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight Hearing
Deposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight Hearing The passage records a procedural disagreement about marking exhibits during a deposition. It mentions no high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or substantive allegations of misconduct, offering only a minor lead about internal procedural friction. Key insights: Mr. Leopold threatens court sanctions if exhibits are removed unmarked.; Mr. Tein disputes the claim that exhibits are unmarked.; Mr. Goldberger references long‑standing practice without prior disputes.
Summary
Deposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight Hearing The passage records a procedural disagreement about marking exhibits during a deposition. It mentions no high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or substantive allegations of misconduct, offering only a minor lead about internal procedural friction. Key insights: Mr. Leopold threatens court sanctions if exhibits are removed unmarked.; Mr. Tein disputes the claim that exhibits are unmarked.; Mr. Goldberger references long‑standing practice without prior disputes.
Tags
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.