Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-013466House Oversight

Affidavit Seeking Release of Jeffrey Epstein Tape for Civil Trial Evidence

Affidavit Seeking Release of Jeffrey Epstein Tape for Civil Trial Evidence The passage reveals an affidavit from an attorney (Brad Feats/Edwards) requesting a tape of Jeffrey Epstein’s statements to be used as evidence in civil litigation involving alleged minor abuse. It identifies specific legal actors (the attorney, Anne B. Carroll, Daily News) and mentions a potential perjury claim and punitive damages strategy. While it provides a concrete lead—locating the tape and understanding why it was withheld—it lacks details on who controls the tape, its current whereabouts, or any financial transactions, limiting its immediate investigative impact. Key insights: Attorney Brad Feats/Edwards filed an affidavit on April 23, 2010 requesting a tape of Epstein’s statements.; The tape is claimed to be critical for proving perjury, lack of remorse, and for the Jane Doe civil case.; Anne B. Carroll (Daily News) warned that playing or disclosing the tape could waive privilege and jeopardize the attorney’s job.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-013466
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Affidavit Seeking Release of Jeffrey Epstein Tape for Civil Trial Evidence The passage reveals an affidavit from an attorney (Brad Feats/Edwards) requesting a tape of Jeffrey Epstein’s statements to be used as evidence in civil litigation involving alleged minor abuse. It identifies specific legal actors (the attorney, Anne B. Carroll, Daily News) and mentions a potential perjury claim and punitive damages strategy. While it provides a concrete lead—locating the tape and understanding why it was withheld—it lacks details on who controls the tape, its current whereabouts, or any financial transactions, limiting its immediate investigative impact. Key insights: Attorney Brad Feats/Edwards filed an affidavit on April 23, 2010 requesting a tape of Epstein’s statements.; The tape is claimed to be critical for proving perjury, lack of remorse, and for the Jane Doe civil case.; Anne B. Carroll (Daily News) warned that playing or disclosing the tape could waive privilege and jeopardize the attorney’s job.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightmedium-importancejeffrey-epsteincivil-litigationsexual-abuseevidence-handlingperjury
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.