Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Internal memo on personal budgeting and goal planning by SET Consulting president
Case File
kaggle-ho-013837House Oversight

Internal memo on personal budgeting and goal planning by SET Consulting president

Internal memo on personal budgeting and goal planning by SET Consulting president The passage is a routine internal guidance document on financial planning and goal setting. It contains no allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑profile officials or controversial actions, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Provides a formula for calculating target monthly income (TMI) using monthly and one‑time expenses.; Emphasizes short‑term (3‑6 month) planning and immediate action steps.; Signed by Jared, president of SET Consulting.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-013837
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Internal memo on personal budgeting and goal planning by SET Consulting president The passage is a routine internal guidance document on financial planning and goal setting. It contains no allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑profile officials or controversial actions, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Provides a formula for calculating target monthly income (TMI) using monthly and one‑time expenses.; Emphasizes short‑term (3‑6 month) planning and immediate action steps.; Signed by Jared, president of SET Consulting.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightfinancial-planninginternal-memogoal-setting

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Trex could be a different way of handling monthly and one-time goals. Ill use your example of an Aston Martin’s monthly payment, a personal assistant’s monthly payment, and a trip to the Croatian coast. While the first two should certainly be totaled and included in your target monthly income, the trip is something that should be divided by the number of months between now and the dreamline’s total time. Thus if you had a six-month dreamline: Aston Martin = 2,003 per month Personal assistant = 400 per month Croatian trip = 934 total, and thus 934/6 per month Right now in the book and in the spreadsheet we have (2003 + 400 + 934) x 1.3 monthly expenses = Target Monthly Income (or TMI). But I think it should be (2003 + 400 + 934/6 x 1.3 monthly expenses = TMI. Or, more generally: [Monthly Goals + (One-Time Goals / Total Months)] x 1.3 monthly expenses = TMI. — JARED , president, SET Consulting 6. Determine three steps for each of the four dreams in just the 6-month timeline and take the first step now. I’m not a big believer in long-term planning and far-off goals. In fact, I generally set 3-month and 6- month dreamlines. The variables change too much and in-the-future distance becomes an excuse for postponing action. The objective of this exercise isn’t, therefore, to outline every step from start to finish, but to define the end goal, the required vehicle to achieve them (TMI, TDI), and build momentum with critical first steps. From that point, it’s a matter of freeing time and generating the TMI, which the following chapters cover. First, let’s focus on those critical first steps. Define three steps for each dream that will get you closer to its actualization. Set actions —simple, well-defined actions —for now, tomorrow (complete before 11 A.M.) and the day after (again completed before 11 A.M.). Once you have three steps for each of the four goals, complete the three actions in the “now” column. Do it now. Each should be simple enough to do in five minutes or less. If not, rachet it down. If it’s the middle of the night and you can’t call someone, do something else now, such as send an e-mail, and set the call for first thing tomorrow. If the next stage is some form of research, get in touch with someone who knows the answer instead of spending too much time in books or online, which can turn into paralysis by analysis. The best first step, the one I recommend, is finding someone who’s done it and ask for advice on how to do the same. It’s not hard. Other options include setting a meeting or phone call with a trainer, mentor, or salesperson to build momentum. Can you schedule a private class or a commitment that you'll feel bad about canceling? Use guilt to your advantage. Tomorrow becomes never. No matter how small the task, take the first step now! => COMFORT CHALLENGE

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Religious Humanism and Historical Theological Debate – No Evident Investigative Leads

Religious Humanism and Historical Theological Debate – No Evident Investigative Leads The document discusses historical philosophy and theology with no mention of contemporary actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no actionable leads for investigation and contains no sensitive or novel allegations involving powerful individuals or institutions. Key insights: Describes the transmission of Aristotle's works among Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in medieval Spain and Sicily.; References scholarly works by Richard Rubinstein, Anders Nygren, and others on religious humanism and the agape‑eros‑caritas debate.; Highlights the tension between Christian concepts of love (agape) and secular/philosophical notions (eros).

1p
House OversightUnknown

Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie Wexner, Harvard officials, and political elites

Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie Wexner, Harvard officials, and political elites The passage provides numerous specific allegations – dates, dollar amounts, meetings, and alleged quid‑pro quo arrangements – that could be pursued for evidence of financial flows, abuse of influence, and coordinated legal obstruction. It implicates powerful actors (Wexner, Harvard leadership, a U.S. state attorney, and potentially members of the British royal family) and suggests systematic surveillance and intimidation of investigators. While many claims are unverified and some are repetitive, the level of detail (e.g., $30 M investment, $1 mansion sale, non‑prosecution agreement clause protecting co‑conspirators) makes it a strong investigative lead. Key insights: 1996 meeting on Epstein’s jet linking Dershowitz to Leslie Wexner’s birthday party.; Epstein’s claim that Wexner sold a Manhattan mansion to him for $1.; 1997 $30 M investment in Boston Provident allegedly sourced from Wexner, with half‑million from Dershowitz.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Bibliographic List on Logic and Mathematics – No Evident Investigative Leads

Bibliographic List on Logic and Mathematics – No Evident Investigative Leads The passage consists solely of book and article citations related to logic, mathematics, and cellular automata. It contains no references to individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or actions that could be investigated. Consequently, it offers no actionable leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkage. Key insights: All entries are scholarly works on logic, set theory, and related topics.; No mention of political figures, government agencies, or financial matters.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Historical drug research notes mention Hitler's alleged amphetamine use

Historical drug research notes mention Hitler's alleged amphetamine use The passage discusses scientific observations on entheogenic and stimulant drugs and includes an unverified claim that Hitler used amphetamines. It does not provide concrete, actionable leads, recent actors, financial flows, or new evidence linking powerful current officials to misconduct. The only notable figure is a historical one, limiting investigative usefulness and novelty. Key insights: Describes increased entropy metrics in rats given entheogenic drugs versus decreased metrics with stimulants.; Cites historical claim that Adolf Hitler allegedly took large doses of Benzedrine for 20 years.; References past researchers (Geyer, Martin Paulus, David Segal, Heinrich Kluver) and their work on drug effects.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Jeffery A. Martin"

1p
House OversightUnknown

General discussion of surveillance history and Snowden revelations

General discussion of surveillance history and Snowden revelations The passage provides a broad overview of surveillance practices and historical context but does not contain specific, actionable leads, new allegations, or concrete details linking powerful actors to misconduct. Key insights: Mentions Snowden's disclosures about government collection of phone and internet data.; References historical surveillance by J. Edgar Hoover's FBI on civil rights leaders.; States that surveillance programs were authorized by the President, Congress, and federal judges.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.