Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-013860House Oversight

Internal memo advising staff on meeting avoidance tactics

Internal memo advising staff on meeting avoidance tactics The passage provides generic workplace advice on limiting meeting time and deflecting interruptions. It contains no references to powerful officials, financial transactions, or misconduct, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Suggests setting 30‑minute limits for meetings and using fabricated commitments.; Recommends using headphones or feigned phone calls to deter interruptions.; Describes a “Puppy Dog Close” sales technique adapted to push for eliminating meetings.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-013860
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Internal memo advising staff on meeting avoidance tactics The passage provides generic workplace advice on limiting meeting time and deflecting interruptions. It contains no references to powerful officials, financial transactions, or misconduct, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Suggests setting 30‑minute limits for meetings and using fabricated commitments.; Recommends using headphones or feigned phone calls to deter interruptions.; Describes a “Puppy Dog Close” sales technique adapted to push for eliminating meetings.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightworkplace-culturemeeting-managementinternal-communications

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4. Speaking of 30 minutes, if you absolutely cannot stop a meeting or call from happening, define the end time. Do not leave these discussions open-ended, and keep them short. If things are well-defined, decisions should not take more than 30 minutes. Cite other commitments at odd times to make them more believable (e.g., 3:20 vs. 3:30) and force people to focus instead of socializing, commiserating, and digressing. If you must join a meeting that is scheduled to last a long time or that is open-ended, inform the organizer that you would like permission to cover your portion first, as you have a commitment in 15 minutes. If you have to, feign an urgent phone call. Get the hell out of there and have someone else update you later. The other option is to be completely transparent and voice your opinion of how unnecessary the meeting is. If you choose this route, be prepared to face fire and offer alternatives. 5. The cubicle is your temple—don’t permit casual visitors. Some suggest using a clear “do not disturb” sign of some type, but I have found that this is ignored unless you have an office. My approach was to put headphones on, even if I wasn’t listening to anything. If someone approached me despite this discouragement, I would pretend to be on the phone. I’d put a finger to my lips, say something like, “I hear you,” and then say into the mic, “Can you hold on a second?” Next, I’d turn to the invader and say, “Hi. What can I do for you?” I wouldn’t let them “get back to me” but rather force the person to give me a five-second summary and then send me an e-mail if necessary. If headphone games aren’t your thing, the reflexive response to an invader should be the same as when answering the cell phone: “Hi, invader. I’m right in the middle of something. How can I be of help?” If it’s not clear within 30 seconds, ask the person to send you an e-mail about the chosen issue; do not offer to send them an e-mail first: “Il be happy to help, but I have to finish this first. Can you send me a quick e-mail to remind me?” If you still cannot deflect an invader, give the person a time limit on your availability, which can also be used for phone conversations: “OK, I only have two minutes before a call, but what’s the situation and what can I do to help?” 6. Use the Puppy Dog Close to help your superiors and others develop the no-meeting habit. The Puppy Dog Close in sales is so named because it is based on the pet store sales approach: If someone likes a puppy but is hesitant to make the life-altering purchase, just offer to let them take the pup home and bring it back if they change their minds. Of course, the return seldom happens. The Puppy Dog Close is invaluable whenever you face resistance to permanent changes. Get your foot in the door with a “let’s just try it once” reversible trial. Compare the following: “T think you’d love this puppy. It will forever add to your responsibilities until he dies 10 years from now. No more care-free vacations, and you'll finally get to pick up poop all over the city— what do you think?” Vs. Now imagine walking up to your boss in the hallway and clapping a hand on her shoulder: “I'd like to go to the meeting, but I have a better idea. Let’s never have another one, since all we do is waste time and not decide anything useful.” VS. The second set of alternatives seem less permanent, and they’re intended to appear so. Repeat this

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein’s Elite Network and Unverified Claims of Government ‘Bounty Hunting’

The passage lists numerous high‑profile individuals and institutions linked to Epstein, providing names and affiliations that could be pursued for financial or influence investigations. However, it la Epstein claimed to have worked as a “bounty hunter” recovering money for the government or wealthy c He was a limited partner at Bear Stearns under mentorship of Ace Greenberg and James Cayne. Member

1p
House OversightUnknown

Local sports roundup with Scott Boras comments on Dodgers and Mets valuations

Local sports roundup with Scott Boras comments on Dodgers and Mets valuations The passage is a mixed local sports article with no concrete allegations, financial transaction details, or actionable leads involving powerful officials. It mentions Scott Boras' remarks on MLB team sales and a vague reference to the Mets' payment to a Madoff trustee, but provides no names, dates, or evidence of wrongdoing. The content is largely routine sports reporting, offering minimal investigative value. Key insights: Scott Boras likens Dodgers and Mets financial situations to supermarket categories.; Dodgers reportedly sold for $2 billion; Mets owners to pay up to $162 million to a Madoff trustee.; Mentions of high‑profile MLB figures (Mark Walter, Stan Kasten, Magic Johnson) in Dodgers ownership group.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bill Siegel email chain discussing 'The Control Factor' and anti‑Islamic conspiracy narrative

The passage is an internal email and interview transcript promoting a conspiratorial worldview about 'Islamic Enemy' and 'Civilization Jihad.' It mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a sender but provides no c Email originates from Jeffrey Epstein's address, but only contains a casual invitation and a link to Bill Siegel outlines a theory called the 'Control Factor' that frames Islam as a coordinated threa

20p
House OversightUnknown

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The provided file contains only a title and no substantive text, offering no names, transactions, dates, or allegations to pursue. Consequently, it provides no investigative leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkages. Key insights: Document contains only a header and filename.; No mention of individuals, agencies, or actions.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Michael Wolff discusses covert meeting with alleged ‘right hand of the Deputy Crown Prince’ and potential Saudi media ties

Michael Wolff discusses covert meeting with alleged ‘right hand of the Deputy Crown Prince’ and potential Saudi media ties The email hints at a secretive liaison between a liberal media figure and a high‑level Saudi official (likely the deputy crown prince) and mentions a possible media‑Saudi partnership. However, it lacks concrete details—no names, dates, money flows, or explicit wrongdoing—making it a moderate‑value lead that warrants follow‑up but is not yet a blockbuster. Key insights: Wolff claims to have unique access to the Trump circle and is coordinating a meeting with an unnamed senior Saudi official.; Reference to "right hand of the Dep Cr Prince" suggests a connection to Saudi Arabia’s deputy crown prince.; Wolff hints at a media‑Saudi collaboration opportunity.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.