Certificate of Service listing attorneys and law firms in House Oversight case 1:15‑cv‑07433‑RWS
Certificate of Service listing attorneys and law firms in House Oversight case 1:15‑cv‑07433‑RWS The passage only provides a routine service certificate with contact information for attorneys and firms. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or links to high‑level officials, making it low‑value for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Document is a Certificate of Service dated March 17, 2017.; Lists attorneys Sigrid S. McCawley, Meredith Schultz, Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell, and J. Stanley Pottinger.; Identifies law firms Boies, Schiller & Flexner; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman; and individual counsel.
Summary
Certificate of Service listing attorneys and law firms in House Oversight case 1:15‑cv‑07433‑RWS The passage only provides a routine service certificate with contact information for attorneys and firms. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or links to high‑level officials, making it low‑value for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Document is a Certificate of Service dated March 17, 2017.; Lists attorneys Sigrid S. McCawley, Meredith Schultz, Bradley J. Edwards, Paul G. Cassell, and J. Stanley Pottinger.; Identifies law firms Boies, Schiller & Flexner; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman; and individual counsel.
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Maxwell Disputes
Case 18-2868, Document 284, 08/09/2019, 2628244, Page1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. -------------------------------------------------- ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Statement of Contested Facts and Plaintiff’s “Undisputed Facts” Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1 Laura A. M
EFTA01652143
EFTA00032751
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures
The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s
Florida Office
Cr 1) '.1.d Florida Office Bradley J. Edwards *Ol Seth M. Lehrman 't Brittany N. Henderson *0 Matthew D. Weissing EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC October 21, 2020 FOIA PRIVACY EXEMPTION VIA E-MAIL AND FEDEX The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor New York. New York 10007 Dear New York Office J. Stanley Pottinger j Admitted in California 0 Admitted in I>istrict of Columbia • Admitted m Florida t Admitted in New York Beard (:crtified Civil Trial lau)rr Re: Re tuest for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request) Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al., SDNY Case No. 1:19-cv-07773 Victim: In follow up to our previous communications, please accept this as our formal written request for documentary and tangible evidence currently in the in the possession, custody, and control of the Department of Justice by way of the Southern District of New York relatin
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.