Court denies amendment to add two additional Jane Doe petitioners under Rule 15
Court denies amendment to add two additional Jane Doe petitioners under Rule 15 The passage details routine procedural arguments in a civil rights case, mentioning only unnamed petitioners and the government’s opposition. It provides no concrete leads on influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct, offering minimal investigative value. Key insights: Two additional Jane Doe victims sought to join the lawsuit under Rule 21 and later Rule 15.; The government opposed joinder, arguing procedural impropriety and undue delay.; The district court exercised discretion and denied the amendment.
Summary
Court denies amendment to add two additional Jane Doe petitioners under Rule 15 The passage details routine procedural arguments in a civil rights case, mentioning only unnamed petitioners and the government’s opposition. It provides no concrete leads on influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct, offering minimal investigative value. Key insights: Two additional Jane Doe victims sought to join the lawsuit under Rule 21 and later Rule 15.; The government opposed joinder, arguing procedural impropriety and undue delay.; The district court exercised discretion and denied the amendment.
Tags
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.