Leak of Professor Hill affidavit on abortion discussion implicates Judge Thomas and Senator Joe Biden
Leak of Professor Hill affidavit on abortion discussion implicates Judge Thomas and Senator Joe Biden The passage suggests a possible internal leak of an affidavit concerning a debate on abortion between a professor and a judge, with a senior senator (Joe Biden) interrupting. While it names high‑profile figures, it provides no concrete evidence, dates, or financial transactions, limiting its investigative utility. The claim could be sensitive if true, but the lack of specifics makes it a low‑to‑moderate lead. Key insights: A whistleblower leaked an affidavit from Professor Hill to NPR reporter Nina Totenberg.; The affidavit allegedly records a disagreement between Judge Thomas and Professor Hill on Roe v. Wade.; Senator Joseph Biden is reported to have interrupted the testimony, suggesting political sensitivity.
Summary
Leak of Professor Hill affidavit on abortion discussion implicates Judge Thomas and Senator Joe Biden The passage suggests a possible internal leak of an affidavit concerning a debate on abortion between a professor and a judge, with a senior senator (Joe Biden) interrupting. While it names high‑profile figures, it provides no concrete evidence, dates, or financial transactions, limiting its investigative utility. The claim could be sensitive if true, but the lack of specifics makes it a low‑to‑moderate lead. Key insights: A whistleblower leaked an affidavit from Professor Hill to NPR reporter Nina Totenberg.; The affidavit allegedly records a disagreement between Judge Thomas and Professor Hill on Roe v. Wade.; Senator Joseph Biden is reported to have interrupted the testimony, suggesting political sensitivity.
Tags
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.