Court filing argues that Judge Marra's order does not bar unredacted documents on alleged sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in Epstein-related CVRA case
Summary
Court filing argues that Judge Marra's order does not bar unredacted documents on alleged sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in Epstein-related CVRA case The passage identifies a legal dispute over the confidentiality of documents that could contain allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to sexual abuse of a known victim (Virginia Giuffre) within the broader Jeffrey Epstein context. It suggests a possible avenue to obtain unredacted records, which could reveal further details about powerful individuals and government duties. While the lead is specific and actionable (court motions, potential re‑filing), the information is already part of public litigation and does not yet expose new financial flows or direct misconduct by top officials, limiting its score to the strong‑lead range. Key insights: Judge Marra allowed Giuffre to testify but initially struck certain allegations as confidential.; The order permits re‑filing of documents with omitted portions, suggesting unredacted material may become public.; Dershowitz claims the order precludes unredacted documents, which the filing disputes.
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Related Documents (6)
Affidavit alleges Alan Dershowitz visited Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion during alleged sexual abuse of minors
The passage provides sworn testimony from two Epstein household employees that directly places a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, at the Epstein residence while underage girls were present, inc Household employee Juan Alessi testified Dershowitz visited the mansion 4‑5 times a year, staying 2‑ Alessi said Dershowitz was present when Virginia Roberts Giuffre was at the house and received mas
Deposition excerpt reveals Alan Dershowitz on call‑in line during testimony about Epstein‑related abuse allegations
The passage documents a live deposition where Alan Dershowitz was identified on a call‑in line, discussing a comment about moving on and denying knowledge of abuse allegations involving Jeffrey Epstei Alan Dershowitz was the only identified participant on a call‑in line during a deposition on 10/20/2 Witness questioned the presence of an unidentified party and the possibility of a muted participan
Draft transcript excerpt mentions Jeffrey Epstein invoking the Fifth and a reference to Alan Dershowitz
The passage provides a vague, uncited reference to Epstein and Dershowitz refusing to answer questions in a hearing. It lacks concrete details—no dates, transactions, or specific allegations—making it Jeffrey Epstein allegedly took the Fifth Amendment during a court hearing. A question about Alan Dershowitz was raised, and he also invoked the Fifth. The excerpt is labeled as a rough draft and appe
Alleged Links Between Bradley Edwards, Rothstein’s Ponzi Scheme, and Jeffrey Epstein’s Non‑Prosecution Agreement
The passage suggests a chain of actors—Bradley Edwards, lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and the late financier Rothstein—who may have leveraged Epstein’s alleged non‑prosecution agreement for extortion or bla Bradley Edwards joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and allegedly showed Epstein‑related documents Rothstein’s wealth is claimed to stem from a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme running since 2005. Edwards
Document references alleged Epstein trafficking and ties to Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Alan Dershowitz
The passage lists specific high‑profile individuals (Clinton, Trump, Dershowitz) linked to Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged sexual abuse network and includes anecdotal statements and flight‑log references th Bill Clinton is noted to have flown on Epstein’s private jet multiple times per flight logs. Donald Trump is quoted praising Epstein as a “terrific guy” and commenting on his attraction to youn Alan
18-2868; 16-3945-cv(L)
18-2868; 16-3945-cv(L) Brown v. Maxwell; Dershotvitz v. Giuffre 3n tlje Elute)) i§tateo Court of appeat55 for the i§ecortb Circuit AUGUST TERM 2018 No. 18-2868-cv JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD COMPANY, Intervenors-Appellants, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellee, v. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 16-3945-cv(L) No. 17-1625 (CON) No. 17-1722(CON) ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA, Intervenors-Appellants, EFTA00092308 V. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellee: On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ARGUED: MARCH 6, 2019 DECIDED: JULY 3, 2019 Before: r —ABRANES, POOLER, and DRONEY, Circuit Judges. Intervenors-Appellants Alan Dershowitz, Michael Cernovich, and the Miami Herald Company (with reporter Julie Brown) appeal from certain orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Robert W. Sweet,
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.