Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-016380House Oversight

Academic discussion on algorithmic vs. clinical prediction methods

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-016380
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Academic discussion on algorithmic vs. clinical prediction methods The passage is a scholarly commentary on the history of algorithms and a summary of psychological research. It contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerful actors or controversial actions. Key insights: Defines 'algorist' as someone suspicious of human judgment in scientific contexts.; Cites a 1996 study comparing subjective clinical predictions to algorithmic methods across various domains.; Claims algorithmic approaches often outperform subjective ones in accuracy.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightalgorithmspredictionpsychology-researchscience-history
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.