Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Manhattan DA office’s internal miscommunication on unsealing Epstein appellate briefs and suggestion to notify Florida prosecutorsCase Filekaggle-ho-016426House OversightManhattan DA office’s internal miscommunication on unsealing Epstein appellate briefs and suggestion to notify Florida prosecutors
Unknown1p1 persons
Manhattan DA office’s internal miscommunication on unsealing Epstein appellate briefs and suggestion to notify Florida prosecutors
Manhattan DA office’s internal miscommunication on unsealing Epstein appellate briefs and suggestion to notify Florida prosecutors The passage reveals a procedural dispute and a possible internal miscommunication within the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office regarding the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. It mentions a suggested notification to the Palm Beach County State Attorney’s Office, offering a concrete lead (names, dates, agencies) for further investigation, but it lacks direct evidence of wrongdoing or financial flows, limiting its impact. Key insights: December 21, 2018: New York Post filed motion to unseal Epstein appellate briefs with redacted victim names.; DA office initially appeared to oppose the motion, then claimed no position after internal miscommunication.; Assistant DA Karen Friedman Agnifilo cited a miscommunication by Mr. Frost as the cause of the contradictory stance.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.