Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Bruce Reinhart allegedly switched sides to represent Jeffrey Epstein's staff after leaving DOJ
Summary
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Bruce Reinhart allegedly switched sides to represent Jeffrey Epstein's staff after leaving DOJ The passage provides a concrete timeline and specific individuals (Bruce Reinhart, Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova) suggesting a potential conflict of interest and misuse of confidential DOJ information. It offers actionable leads—court records, sworn declaration, DOJ dispute—that merit further investigation into possible violations of Justice Department policies and obstruction of the Epstein investigation. While the claim is not yet verified, it ties a former federal prosecutor to a high‑profile criminal case, raising moderate controversy and legal risk if substantiated. Key insights: Reinhart left the U.S. Attorney’s Office on Jan. 1, 2008 and began representing Epstein‑related individuals on Jan. 2, 2008.; He was named in the Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit accusing him of violating DOJ policies by switching sides.; Reinhart denied accessing confidential information, but the U.S. Attorney’s Office disputes his claim.
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Related Documents (6)
Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (2008)
The non-prosecution agreement negotiated by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta shielded Jeffrey Epstein and unnamed 'potential co-conspirators' from federal sex trafficking charges. Epstein pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges and served approximately 13 months with work release. The NPA was later ruled by Judge Kenneth Marra to have violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to notify victims. The agreement granted immunity to Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, and other unnamed associates.
Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019
SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019 SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Contents Public Corruption 2 Epstein 2 General Crimes 14 Sprecher 14 Violent and Organized Crime 20 Walter 20 Civil Division 22 NYCHA 22 Securities and Commodities Fraud 24 Margulies 24 Sharma and Farkas 26 Matters of Interest 28 Obama-era counsel Greg Craig's trial postponed; new jury to be selected 28 Epstein Saga Puts Spotlight on Crime Victim's Rights Act 30 Donziger Faces Criminal Contempt Prosecution Team at Seward & Kissel 34 Jail Where Epstein Died Has Record of Security Blunders 36 2nd Circuit's Decision Could Embolden Federal Anti-Corruption Prosecutors 38 1 EFTA00094388 SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Public Corruption Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me When I Was 15 NYT By Jennifer Araoz 8/14/19 The first time I stepped into Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side in the fall of 2001, I noticed his security cameras. They w
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant
Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS
From: Cc: Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:15:07 +0000 Attachments: 2019 8-14.pdf SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 EFTA00094360 Contents Public Corruption Epstein General Crimes Sprecher Violent and Organized Crime Walter Civil Division NYCHA Securities and Commodities Fraud Margulies Sharma and Farkas Matters of Interest Obama-era counsel Greg Craig's trial postponed; new jiLD, to be selected Epstein Saga Puts Spotlight on Crime Victim's Rights Act Donziger Faces Criminal Contempt Prosecution Team at Seward & Kissel Jail Where Epstein Died Has Record of Security Blunders 2nd Circuit's Decision Could Embolden Federal Anti-Corruption Prosecutors Public Corruption Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me When I Was 15 NYT By Jennifer Araoz 8/14/19 The first time I stepped into Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side in the fall of 2001, I noticed his security cameras.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00077606 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.