Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-016454House Oversight

Villafafia’s 2007 Letter to Epstein Attorney Suggests Direct Involvement in Favorable Agreement

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-016454
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Villafafia’s 2007 Letter to Epstein Attorney Suggests Direct Involvement in Favorable Agreement The passage reveals a private communication from Villafafia, a government official, to an attorney representing Jeffrey Epstein, indicating she was actively managing the impact of an agreement on Epstein. While it hints at possible preferential treatment, the excerpt lacks concrete details on the agreement, dates beyond the letter, or any financial transactions, limiting immediate investigative steps. Nonetheless, it provides a lead linking a public official to Epstein that could merit further document review. Key insights: Villafafia expressed frustration over a dispute resolution involving Epstein.; She claimed to have 'bent over backwards' to consider the agreement’s effect on Epstein.; The letter is dated Dec. 13, 2007, and was sent to Epstein’s attorney, Lefkowitz.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightmedium-importancejeffrey-epsteingovernment-oversightpotential-conflict-of-interestlegal-correspondence
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict

Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict The passage provides concrete names (Jeffrey Sloman, Acosta, Lefkowitz, Starr) and dates (2008, 2013) showing possible obstruction of victim notifications in the Epstein case, suggesting a lead for investigating DOJ and FBI decision‑making. While it ties high‑level officials, the claim of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys is not yet corroborated, limiting the score to the high‑mid range. Key insights: Jeffrey Sloman, top aide to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, planned to notify Epstein victims after a plea deal was signed.; Lefkowitz warned Acosta that the office had promised not to contact victims or potential claimants.; Federal prosecutors resumed the FBI investigation and interviewed witnesses in NY and NM while plea negotiations continued.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Good afternoon all,

Good afternoon all, Below please find complaints from Epstein's attorneys. Can you check to see if he has toilet paper and that his CPAP is plugged in? I am less concerned regarding his complaint of having had two calls, but they were on unmonitored lines, so there is no recording of them. Is his phone account set up so he can get a call on the ITS when 30 days has elapsed? iiih Thank you, Supervisory Staff Attorney CLC New York M r li n orrectional Center New York. New York 10007 >» Good afternoon Mr. Our client, Jeffrey Epstein, has informed us that he has no toilet paper in his cell. he was unable to use it. > 8/6/2019 3:20 PM >>> Also, since his arrival at MCC, he has only been able to make two fifteen minute phone, with officers present. Thank you in advance for your help. Best, New York NY 10016 His CPap machine was not phone calls. Both times, the plugged in last night, so calls were on speaker NOTICE: This message may contain information that is privileg

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10)

FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10) -1 of 2- FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION OrmumBzoono ...,... ..... Date of entry 72/31/2019 , date of birth , was interviewed at 505 S Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, Florida. Present for the interview was FBI Victim Specialist , Detective and Special Agent . After being advised of the identities of the above listed individuals and the nature of the interview, provided the following information: grew up i . She is currently married and works at an anthropology store. She attended Middle school and High school. She then attended College. was attending High School at the time of the incident. The incident was around 2004 when she was 15 years old. believed it was during the summer because she had more of an open schedule. Her parents had divorced and her mother purchased a business. Because of this, her mother was very busy, and started becoming very rebellious and started using drugs. Her friend , whose last name did not wish to shar

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.