Academic analysis of federal vs. state prosecutorial discretion and underenforcement

Academic analysis of federal vs. state prosecutorial discretion and underenforcement The passage provides a scholarly overview of prosecutorial accountability and enforcement gaps, but offers no specific names, transactions, dates, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to misconduct. It is largely theoretical and already part of public discourse. Key insights: Federal prosecution is influenced by presidential administration priorities.; State prosecutors are often elected, limiting judicial review of charging decisions.; Federal enforcement is stronger for public corruption and civil‑rights crimes than for police violence or sexual assault.