Court denies personal jurisdiction over Prince Mohamed in alleged terrorism financing case

Court denies personal jurisdiction over Prince Mohamed in alleged terrorism financing case The passage outlines legal arguments about jurisdiction and mentions possible links between Prince Mohamed’s banks and terrorist financing, but provides no concrete evidence, transactions, or new allegations. It offers a modest investigative lead—potential financial ties to al‑Qaeda‑linked banks—that could be pursued, yet the information is largely procedural and already part of public filings. Key insights: Prince Mohamed is an officer of DMI, IICG, and FIBS.; Plaintiffs allege DMI and FIBS may have financed terrorism.; Banks chaired by Prince Mohamed had historic accounts linked to al‑Qaeda operatives.