Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-017966House Oversight

Jeffrey Epstein’s Lenient Federal Deal Allegedly Backed by Labor Secretary’s Office and Potential Prosecutorial Conspiracy

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-017966
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Jeffrey Epstein’s Lenient Federal Deal Allegedly Backed by Labor Secretary’s Office and Potential Prosecutorial Conspiracy The passage identifies a direct link between a current senior administration official (Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta) and the federal prosecutors who negotiated Epstein’s unusually favorable plea, and cites a lawsuit alleging a conspiracy to conceal the deal from victims. This provides concrete names, a specific case number, and a legal avenue (victims’ rights lawsuit) that investigators could pursue, making it a strong, actionable lead. While the allegations are not yet proven, they involve high‑level officials and could generate significant controversy if validated. Key insights: Alexander Acosta, now Labor Secretary, testified he was unaware of Epstein’s preferential treatment.; Court records show prosecutors under Acosta’s authority acquiesced to Epstein’s demands, including avoiding prison.; Victim Courtney Wild is suing the U.S. government, claiming a conspiracy to hide the plea agreement.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighthigh-importancejeffrey-epsteinalexander-acostalabor-departmentfederal-prosecutionvictims'-rights
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

In re Wild, 955 F.3d 1196 (2020)

In re Wild, 955 F.3d 1196 (2020) 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1020 955 Pad 1196 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. IN RE: Petitioner. No. 19-13843 (April 14, 2020) Synopsis Background: Alleged victim of child sexual abuse brought civil action against federal government, alleging that government violated Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with alleged victim before entering into non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with alleged perpetrator. Alleged perpetrator intervened. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, Kenneth A. Marra, Senior District Judge, 359 F.Supp.3d 1201, determined that government had violated CVRA, but after alleged perpetrator's death, alleged victim's requested remedies were denied and the action was dismissed, 411 F.Supp.3d 1321. Alleged victim petitioned for writ of mandamus. (Holding:) The Court of Appeals, Newsom, Circuit Judge, held that as a matter of first im

44p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawmakers demand probe of Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution deal

The passage links a senior cabinet official (Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta) to a secret plea agreement that granted immunity to Jeffrey Epstein, a high‑profile sex‑trafficking suspect. It cites Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved a non‑prosecution agreemen More than 30 senators and representatives, including Sen. Marco Rubio and Sen. Patty Murray, have

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

6/19122, 3:62 PM

6/19122, 3:62 PM teSTEIN4 M;i„ ei.A15,DNIER - C,CA,SZNi frietv7 AoS-‘ ,..ci 11,N CC)•:E4 rjetrIW - tELNEPS ‘ -NidPedia tMA\etraE Epstein a massage'. She claims she was taken to his mansion, • Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her Sao° immediately afterward.1120 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.11n1 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.r1391 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.D311 Epstein made many out-of-cogr settlements with alleged vigil-m[1301 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014)*56C, ni3C6 E St P i‘JEt<ri PCS rrl • It-•S A December 3o, 2O14, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1. (Courtney Wild) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's

35p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

6.0:11": DnI6R - CicAL.SR.N Mekri. Hicc--57 /rat N

6.0:11": DnI6R - CicAL.SR.N Mekri. Hicc--57 /rat N EPSI6IN 5119122, 3:62 PM VVAdpedia I. k AN (.4.0 &CZ c%:, OtirgN - (MAkwELL Epstein a massage'. She claims she was taken to his mansion, • Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $2oo immediately afterward..[120 A similar $5o-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.('~91 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.L491 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.' Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.['-39-1 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (201,56 03F1 L. 1' 06C Rt ice' Pitc,t,-111.1/4;ersi PCS IT IC.1\.!,_) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe i (Courtney Wild) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims_' Rights Act by the U.S. Departm

25p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5/19i22, 32 PM

5/19i22, 32 PM re-( - CQbieLikkl e4s.cr,5 4r- eter: Di\lef< CI0 %) FIZCS- 1 ITC7FICW . 140 VCI AR:D Jeffrey Epstein -Mire& Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, ' Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.flag A similar $5o-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.U 91These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed-0-421 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of courtl.≥3'-1 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.[;3_21 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) 50 40 P L lq[3‘-SE St e 'to-4 i‘.; ei•41 PCS isilClV) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 (Courtney Wild) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice'

37p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.