ProPublica article cited in internal email suggests U.S. Attorney Preet Bharata’s leniency toward Wall Street executives after the financial crisis
ProPublica article cited in internal email suggests U.S. Attorney Preet Bharata’s leniency toward Wall Street executives after the financial crisis The passage points to a potential investigative lead that former SDNY U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara may have deliberately under‑pursued Wall Street misconduct, contrasting his high‑profile political corruption cases. It names a specific individual, a federal prosecutor, and hints at selective enforcement, which could merit a review of case files, plea agreements, and communications from 2015‑2017. While the claim is sourced to a public article, the email’s internal nature and the lack of concrete transaction details keep it from being a blockbuster, but it is actionable and ties a senior DOJ official to possible misconduct. Key insights: Email from a private individual flags Bharara’s “non‑heroic” handling of Wall Street cases.; Reference to ProPublica piece provides a public source that can be cross‑checked.; Potential pattern of selective prosecution: aggressive on political corruption, soft on financial crimes.
Summary
ProPublica article cited in internal email suggests U.S. Attorney Preet Bharata’s leniency toward Wall Street executives after the financial crisis The passage points to a potential investigative lead that former SDNY U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara may have deliberately under‑pursued Wall Street misconduct, contrasting his high‑profile political corruption cases. It names a specific individual, a federal prosecutor, and hints at selective enforcement, which could merit a review of case files, plea agreements, and communications from 2015‑2017. While the claim is sourced to a public article, the email’s internal nature and the lack of concrete transaction details keep it from being a blockbuster, but it is actionable and ties a senior DOJ official to possible misconduct. Key insights: Email from a private individual flags Bharara’s “non‑heroic” handling of Wall Street cases.; Reference to ProPublica piece provides a public source that can be cross‑checked.; Potential pattern of selective prosecution: aggressive on political corruption, soft on financial crimes.
Tags
Related Documents (5)
Court Transcript: A-5699
The document is a transcript of a hearing on February 16, 2012, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by Judge William H. Pauley III, in the case United States v. Daugerdas et al.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EFTA Document EFTA01659028
From: Richard Kahn
Former White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler declines Obama’s offer to be Attorney General
The passage provides a routine political development with no new allegations, financial flows, or misconduct. It mentions high‑profile officials but offers no actionable leads beyond the fact that Rue Ruemmler told President Obama she does not want to be nominated for Attorney General. She cited concerns about a difficult confirmation process and potential political attacks on Obama. The email lis
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.