Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-020230House Oversight

Freedom of the Press Foundation allegedly funneled money to WikiLeaks and Manning defense, linking journalists and activists to a covert financing network

Freedom of the Press Foundation allegedly funneled money to WikiLeaks and Manning defense, linking journalists and activists to a covert financing network The passage identifies a specific nonprofit (Freedom of the Press Foundation) and named individuals (Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, John Perry Barlow, Runa Sandvik, Micah Lee) as allegedly using the organization to bypass financial blockades and fund WikiLeaks and Chelsea Manning. It provides concrete names and a timeline (board service in Dec 2012, a Nov 13 2012 blog post) that could be followed up with financial records, nonprofit filings, and communications. However, the claim is largely anecdotal, lacks transaction details, and repeats already‑public narratives about the Foundation’s mission, limiting its novelty and immediate investigative payoff. Key insights: Freedom of the Press Foundation was created to funnel money to WikiLeaks and the Manning defense fund.; Board members included Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, John Perry Barlow, Runa Sandvik, and Micah Lee.; Credit‑card companies allegedly blocked donations, prompting the Foundation’s “money‑laundry” role.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-020230
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Freedom of the Press Foundation allegedly funneled money to WikiLeaks and Manning defense, linking journalists and activists to a covert financing network The passage identifies a specific nonprofit (Freedom of the Press Foundation) and named individuals (Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, John Perry Barlow, Runa Sandvik, Micah Lee) as allegedly using the organization to bypass financial blockades and fund WikiLeaks and Chelsea Manning. It provides concrete names and a timeline (board service in Dec 2012, a Nov 13 2012 blog post) that could be followed up with financial records, nonprofit filings, and communications. However, the claim is largely anecdotal, lacks transaction details, and repeats already‑public narratives about the Foundation’s mission, limiting its novelty and immediate investigative payoff. Key insights: Freedom of the Press Foundation was created to funnel money to WikiLeaks and the Manning defense fund.; Board members included Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, John Perry Barlow, Runa Sandvik, and Micah Lee.; Credit‑card companies allegedly blocked donations, prompting the Foundation’s “money‑laundry” role.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightmedium-importancenonprofit-financingwikileakschelsea-manningglenn-greenwaldlaura-poitras

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
78 Greenwald was an activist as well as a journalist. Like Poitras, he joined the board of directors of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. The foundation, which eventually Runa Sandvik and Micah Lee would join, had been set up expressly to funnel money to both Assange’s Wikileaks site and the defense fund for Bradley Manning after he was arrested. Such a money laundry was necessary because, as will be recalled, American credit card companies were blocking money transfers to these two causes. This “blockade” was taking its toll on Wikileaks. According to Assange, “WikiLeaks had been cut off from more than 90 percent of its finances.” So the Freedom of the Press Foundation came to its rescue. John Perry Barlow, one of the song writers for the Grateful Dead band, was one of its chief financial backers. “The first serious info war is now engaged, Barlow declared. “The field of battle is WikiLeaks.” He served with Greenwald and Poitras on its Board in December 2012. Snowden was an avid reader of Greenwald’s screeds against the government. If he was to assume the role of a modern-day Prometheus, delivering forbidden secrets of the NSA to the public, Greenwald would be a logical candidate to break the story. Snowden could safely assume that Greenwald would be sympathetic to exposing NSA surveillance from his many blogs, tweets and YouTube comments on the subject. For example, on November 13 2012, just 18 days before Snowden contacted him, Greenwald had written a blog in Guardian asserting that the United States was “a surveillance state run amok.” In it, echoing very closely what Snowden said at his Crypto party, Greenwald wrote that “any remnants of internet anonymity have been all but obliterated by the union between the state and technology companies.” Citing a story in the Washington Post, he continued: “Every day, collection systems at the National Security Agency intercept and store 1.7 billion e-mails, phone calls and other types of communications." Asa result, Greenwald called for action in his blog on November 13, 2012, writing: “The US operates a sprawling, unaccountable Surveillance State that, in violent breach of the core guarantees of the Fourth Amendment, monitors and records virtually everything even the most law-abiding citizens do.” That same week Snowden invited Runa Sandvik to co-host his crypto party. One problem for Snowden was reaching out to Greenwald was Greenwald's lack of any encryption for his e-mails. Communicating with a journalist like Greenwald who famously attacked the very organization for which he worked was itself a risky undertaking, especially if he wanted to pass classified NSA documents to him. If his emails were intercepted by the NSA in Brazil (where Greenwald lived) and where the NSA was not restricted by US law, he could lose his job or even be arrested. Under his alias Cincinnatus, he told Greenwald that he needed to immediately encrypt his computer. To make his point, he cited Greenwald’s own November 12, 2012 blog. In it, Greenwald noted that General David Petraeus, then the CIA director, had been caught in a minor sex scandal because his personal emails had been intercepted, Snowden wrote Greenwald that Petraeus would not have been exposed if he had used encryption. Snowden also sent Greenwald instruction on how to install the necessary encryption software and a link to a 12-

Related Documents (5)

House OversightUnknown

General discussion of surveillance history and Snowden revelations

General discussion of surveillance history and Snowden revelations The passage provides a broad overview of surveillance practices and historical context but does not contain specific, actionable leads, new allegations, or concrete details linking powerful actors to misconduct. Key insights: Mentions Snowden's disclosures about government collection of phone and internet data.; References historical surveillance by J. Edgar Hoover's FBI on civil rights leaders.; States that surveillance programs were authorized by the President, Congress, and federal judges.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Sparse references to Snowden interviews and Cold‑War defectors

The excerpt consists mainly of citation fragments and generic statements about past defections and interviews. It provides no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads linking current p Mentions Anatoly Kucherena’s interview about Snowden’s communications. References a Russian researcher (Vassili Sonkine) and author Edward Jay Epstein. Lists a series of Cold‑War American defectors a

1p
House OversightUnknown

Putin allegedly authorized safe‑passage for Edward Snowden, raising questions about Russian facilitation of the NSA leak

Putin allegedly authorized safe‑passage for Edward Snowden, raising questions about Russian facilitation of the NSA leak The passage suggests that President Vladimir Putin personally approved Snowden’s entry and transport in Russia, potentially explaining Aeroflot’s visa waiver and rapid extraction. If true, it links a head of state to the protection of a U.S. intelligence whistleblower, opening avenues to investigate diplomatic communications, flight‑manifest records, and any quid‑pro‑quo with Russian officials. The claim is not widely reported, offers concrete follow‑up steps (e.g., request airline logs, interview Russian consular staff, examine NSA‑Russia liaison logs), and implicates a high‑ranking leader, but lacks hard evidence, keeping it in the moderate‑to‑strong lead range. Key insights: Putin purportedly told an unnamed “agent” that Snowden would be welcome if he stopped damaging Russian‑U.S. relations.; Aeroflot allegedly waived passport/visa checks for Snowden’s flight, possibly on Putin’s orders.; Russian officials reportedly whisked Snowden from Moscow airport to a waiting car within hours of arrival.

1p
House OversightUnknown

NSA’s Global Surveillance Partnerships with Five Eyes and Other Allies

NSA’s Global Surveillance Partnerships with Five Eyes and Other Allies The passage outlines known intelligence-sharing arrangements between the NSA and allied nations, describing capabilities and legal frameworks. It does not provide new, actionable leads, specific transactions, dates, or allegations of misconduct beyond what is already public knowledge. Key insights: NSA collaborates with the Five Eyes alliance (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand) for extensive phone and internet monitoring.; Additional liaisons exist with Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Israel, Japan, and South Korea.; British Intelligence Services Act of 1994 allegedly permits GCHQ officers to conduct illegal acts abroad.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Snowden’s encrypted outreach to Laura Poitras via Freedom of the Press Foundation insiders

Snowden’s encrypted outreach to Laura Poitras via Freedom of the Press Foundation insiders The passage details a concrete chain of encrypted communications linking Edward Snowden, through Freedom of the Press Foundation CTO Lee, to journalist Laura Poitras. It identifies specific aliases, dates, and key individuals (Glenn Greenwald, William Binney, Thomas Drake, Julian Assange) and mentions the use of PGP/TOR. While the overall narrative is already public, the specific mention of Lee’s role as a gateway and the timeline (Jan 23 2013) provide actionable leads for verifying communication logs, key exchanges, and possible undisclosed contacts within the foundation. Key insights: Snowden used alias “Anon108” to contact Lee, CTO of Freedom of the Press Foundation.; Lee supplied Poitras’ public PGP key to Snowden after confirming the alias.; Snowden later used alias “Citizen Four” on Jan 23 2013, falsely claiming senior intelligence roles.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.