Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-020241House Oversight

Snowden’s early NSA contractor onboarding details and subterfuge at Booz Allen

Snowden’s early NSA contractor onboarding details and subterfuge at Booz Allen The passage recounts already‑public information about Edward Snowden’s application fraud, hiring by Booz Allen, and his orientation at the NSA. It offers no new actors, transactions, or undisclosed evidence, limiting investigative usefulness. While it touches on NSA procedures, the content is well‑known and provides little actionable lead. Key insights: Snowden falsified a degree claim on his Booz Allen application.; He was hired as a trainee‑analyst but never worked at the Honolulu office.; Assigned to NSA’s National Operations Threat Center at Kunia base.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-020241
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Snowden’s early NSA contractor onboarding details and subterfuge at Booz Allen The passage recounts already‑public information about Edward Snowden’s application fraud, hiring by Booz Allen, and his orientation at the NSA. It offers no new actors, transactions, or undisclosed evidence, limiting investigative usefulness. While it touches on NSA procedures, the content is well‑known and provides little actionable lead. Key insights: Snowden falsified a degree claim on his Booz Allen application.; He was hired as a trainee‑analyst but never worked at the Honolulu office.; Assigned to NSA’s National Operations Threat Center at Kunia base.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightnsabooz-allen-hamiltonedward-snowdencontractor-hiringsecurity-clearance

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
89 Nevertheless Snowden applied for the job. Since it handled higher level secret documents, Booz Allen had stricter requirements for applicants than Dell. To slip by them, Snowden engaged in a minor subterfuge. He wrote on his application that he was expecting a master’s degree from the online division of Liverpool University in England. In fact, he had not completed a single course at Liverpool, and would not be receiving any sort of a degree from it. Booz Allen, not fully taking into account the discrepancy in his application, agreed to hire him as a trainee-analyst (and it did not change that decision even after it found out about his subterfuge.). According to Admiral McConnell, Snowden never actually worked in the Booz Allen offices, which are housed in a skyscraper in downtown Honolulu. Instead, he was immediately assigned to work at the NSA’s highly-sensitive National Operations Threat Center in the tunnel at the Kunia base. Before he could begin working there, however, he needed to fly to Maryland to take a mandatory orientation course at the NSA. The course was given in an 11 story building, with a sheer wall of black glass, on the NSA’s 350 acre campus at Fort Meade in Maryland. He arrived there from Hawaii on April 1, 2013. Like every other Booz Allen contractors who work at the NSA’s Center, Snowden was required to sign the “Sensitive Compartmented Information Non- Disclosure Agreement.” In this document, Snowden acknowledged that he had been granted access to sensitive compartmented information, called SCI, as part of his work and that he understood that any disclosure of that information to an unauthorized person would violate federal criminal law. He was also told, as were all new contract employees a Booz Allen that its disclosure could damage the interest of the United States and benefit its enemies. In signing it, he swore an oath not to divulge any of this information without first receiving written approval from US authorities. So less than two months before he downloaded Sensitive Compartmented Information, he was fully aware of what would be the consequences of divulging this information. By this time, as discussed in the previous chapter, he had agreed to deliver classified data to three journalists. On April 5, 2013, while still in the training facility in Maryland, he apparently sought to establish a paper trail for himself. He wrote a letter to NSA’s General Counsel Office asking whether or not NSA directives take precedence over acts of Congress. A lawyer from the Office of General Counsel responded three days later, addressing Snowden as “Dear Ed.” The lawyer said, agreeing with Snowden, that acts of Congress take precedence over NSA directives. He also suggested that “Ed” phone him if he needed any further clarification. Presumably, Snowden had written the letter to elicit a response that he could later use to bolster his claim to be a whistle- blower. Instead, the “Dear Ed” response was of little use to Snowden, as it did not dispute his point that NSA directives must lawfully conform to the acts of Congress. The NSA lawyer did not ever hear back from “Ed.” Snowden completed his orientation course at Fort Meade on Friday April 12°2013. While he was in Maryland Snowden, he took time off to pay visits to both of his divorced parents. It would be the last time he would see either of them in the United States.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Sparse House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content

Sparse House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The document contains only a header and no substantive information linking any influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It provides no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Document appears to be a placeholder or file identifier only; No names, dates, transactions, or allegations present

1p
House OversightNov 16, 2015

Draft Document Titled “The Snowden Affair: A Spy Story in Six Parts”

Draft Document Titled “The Snowden Affair: A Spy Story in Six Parts” The passage only provides a title and metadata for a 287‑page draft about the Snowden affair. It contains no specific names, dates, transactions, or allegations that could be pursued as an investigative lead. Consequently, it offers no actionable information and is likely already covered in public discourse. Key insights: Document appears to be a draft manuscript by Edward Jay Epstein.; Length indicated as 287 pages, suggesting extensive coverage.; Associated with a House Oversight file identifier (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020153).

1p
House OversightUnknown

NSA internal report from 1996 warned that outsourced system administrators could become insider threats like Snowden

NSA internal report from 1996 warned that outsourced system administrators could become insider threats like Snowden The passage cites a declassified 1996 NSA threat assessment that predicted insider risk from civilian system administrators – a lead that links NSA contracting practices to later leaks. It provides a concrete document title and timeframe, but lacks specific names of individuals or transactions, limiting immediate investigative steps. The claim is moderately novel and sensitive, implicating a major intelligence agency and its outsourcing model. Key insights: 1996 NSA report titled “Out of Control” warned of an “Ames‑type” penetration via system administrators.; The report identified civilian, contractor‑hired system administrators as a weak security link.; Privileges such as password bypass and external storage transfers were highlighted as breach risks.

1p
Financial RecordUnknown

*UBS

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01274073

314p
House OversightUnknown

NSA audit software gaps enabled Snowden's 2012 data theft while at Dell

NSA audit software gaps enabled Snowden's 2012 data theft while at Dell The passage reiterates known facts about NSA audit deficiencies and Snowden's access, offering no new actors, dates, or transactions beyond what is already public. It provides limited investigative value and low novelty, though it does reference NSA infrastructure and inter‑agency data sharing. Key insights: NSA auditing software was not installed at the Hawaii (Kunia) base due to bandwidth limits.; Lack of real‑time file transfer monitoring allowed Snowden to copy data using admin credentials.; Snowden stole thousands of pages while employed by Dell in 2012.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Snowden’s alleged acquisition of the 2013 Black Budget and its potential value to foreign intelligence services

Snowden’s alleged acquisition of the 2013 Black Budget and its potential value to foreign intelligence services The passage suggests Snowden stole a highly classified Congressional Budget Justification (the 2013 black budget) that details intelligence priorities and funding across multiple agencies. It claims the document would be valuable to adversary nations such as Russia’s SVR, implying a possible financial or strategic motive beyond whistleblowing. This provides a concrete lead (specific document, fiscal year, agencies) and ties to high‑level actors (NSA, CIA, President, Congress) and foreign intelligence services, making it a strong investigative angle, though the claim is unverified and relies on secondary commentary. Key insights: Snowden allegedly took the 2013 Congressional Budget Justification (black budget) while at Booz Allen.; The document lists funding and priorities for NSA, CIA, DIA, NRO, and other agencies.; Former CIA deputy director Michael Morell is quoted saying the SVR would pay millions for such a document.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.