Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-020299House Oversight

CIA mole Alexander Poteyev warns of Russian SVR sleeper‑agent program targeting U.S. intelligence agencies

CIA mole Alexander Poteyev warns of Russian SVR sleeper‑agent program targeting U.S. intelligence agencies The passage identifies a specific SVR colonel (Alexander Poteyev) who allegedly acted as a CIA source in 2010 and describes a planned Russian ‘illegal’ sleeper‑agent network aimed at U.S. agencies. It provides concrete names, dates, and organizational details that could be followed up (e.g., verification of Poteyev’s status, any related communications, and any subsequent SVR activities). While the claim is unverified and lacks direct evidence of wrongdoing beyond the described intent, it links high‑level intelligence actors (CIA, NSA, SVR) and suggests a potential foreign influence operation, meriting moderate investigative value. Key insights: Poteyev, a colonel in Russia’s SVR, is described as a CIA‑paid mole in 2010.; He allegedly reported a Russian plan to build an ‘illegal’ sleeper‑agent network in the United States.; The network would place non‑diplomatic agents to infiltrate U.S. intelligence agencies (CIA, FBI, NSA).

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-020299
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

CIA mole Alexander Poteyev warns of Russian SVR sleeper‑agent program targeting U.S. intelligence agencies The passage identifies a specific SVR colonel (Alexander Poteyev) who allegedly acted as a CIA source in 2010 and describes a planned Russian ‘illegal’ sleeper‑agent network aimed at U.S. agencies. It provides concrete names, dates, and organizational details that could be followed up (e.g., verification of Poteyev’s status, any related communications, and any subsequent SVR activities). While the claim is unverified and lacks direct evidence of wrongdoing beyond the described intent, it links high‑level intelligence actors (CIA, NSA, SVR) and suggests a potential foreign influence operation, meriting moderate investigative value. Key insights: Poteyev, a colonel in Russia’s SVR, is described as a CIA‑paid mole in 2010.; He allegedly reported a Russian plan to build an ‘illegal’ sleeper‑agent network in the United States.; The network would place non‑diplomatic agents to infiltrate U.S. intelligence agencies (CIA, FBI, NSA).

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighthigh-importancerussian-espionagesvrciansaforeign-influence

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
147 CHAPTER EIGHTEEN The Unheeded Warning “The NSA—the world’s most capable signals intelligence organization, an agency immensely skilled in stealing digital data—had had its pockets thoroughly picked.” m= --CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell In April 2010, the CIA received a stark reminder of the ongoing nature of Russian espionage. It came in the form of a message from one of its best placed moles in the Russian intelligence service. This surreptitious source was Alexander Poteyev, a 54-year old colonel in the SVR, which was the successor agency to the First Chief Directorate of the KGB. While the FSB took over the KGB’s domestic role in December 1991, the SVR became Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service. Its operation center was in the Yasenevo district of Moscow. The CIA had recruited Poteyev as its mole in the 1990s when he had been stationed at the Russian Embassy in Washington DC. That it could sustain a mole in Moscow for over a decade attested to its capabilities in the espionage business. After he returned to Moscow, still secretly on the CIA’s payroll, he became the deputy chief of the SVR’s “American” section. This unit of Russian intelligence had the primary responsibility for establishing spies in CIA, FBI, NSA and other American intelligence agencies. The SVR’s last known (or caught) mole in US Intelligence was CIA officer Harold Nicholson in 1996. Before it could now expand its espionage capabilities. It needed to build a network of Russian sleeper agents in the United States. For this network, it needed to groom so-called “illegals,” or agents who were not connected to the Russian Embassy. This so-called “illegals” network was necessary since presumably all Russian diplomats, including the so-called “legal” members of Russian intelligence, were under constant surveillance by the FBI. Advances in surveillance technology in the 21“ century had made it increasingly difficult to communicate with recruit through its diplomatic missions. To evade it, the “American” division of the SVR was given the task of placing individuals in the United States disguised as ordinary Americans. Their “legend,” or operational cover, could be thin since they would not be applying for jobs in the government. Their job was simply blend in with their community until they were called upon by the “American” department in Moscow to service a mole that had been planted in US intelligence or other part of the US government. Until there were activated by such a call, they were classified as sleeper agents. Unlike the SVR’s “legal” officers, who were attached to Russian embassies as diplomats and were protected from arrest by the Treaty of Vienna, the SVR’s illegal agents lack diplomatic immunity. According to Pavel Sudoplatov, who defected from the KGB in the Cold War, the sole job of such sleeper agents was to “live under cover in the West awaiting assignments for the Center.” One assignment that justifies the expense of maintaining such agents is to service a penetration, after one is made, in the US intelligence establishment. While

Related Documents (6)

House OversightNov 17, 2018

Chinese Influence & American Interests – Hoover Institution Publication

Chinese Influence & American Interests – Hoover Institution Publication The document contains only a title and publication note with no substantive details, names, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to any controversy. Key insights: Title suggests a focus on Chinese influence and U.S. interests; Published by the Hoover Institution; No specific individuals, dates, or financial information provided

1p
Dept. of JusticeMay 26, 2015

Correctional Center RFP

Texas Department of Criminal Justice Brad Livingston Executive Director April 24, 2008 Re: Request for Proposals 696-PF-8-P030, Correctional Centers and/or Lockhart Work Program Facility Services Dear Prospective Offeror: Enclosed for your consideration is the above referenced solicitation for the operation and maintenance of Correctional Centers and/or Lockhart Work Program Facilities. When submitting proposals, please ensure all required information is included. Section of the soli

177p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

11 MAY 25-MAY 27 901_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Irons, Janet Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11-29 AM To: Richard C. Smith Cc: Jeffrey T. We Subject: Meeting with Prison Society tomorrow Hello Warden Smith, I'm writing in preparation for our meeting with you and Director Hite tomorrow at 9:30 to talk about the Law Library. We have been in touch with Kim Kelmor, Assistant Director ofthe Law Library at Penn State, who has experience with prison libraries. She has helpfully provided us with some questions and guida

186p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightMar 21, 2005

Court Allows Jurisdictional Discovery into PrivatBank’s U.S. Business Ties in 9/11 Terrorism Litigation

Court Allows Jurisdictional Discovery into PrivatBank’s U.S. Business Ties in 9/11 Terrorism Litigation The passage reveals that plaintiffs in a 9/11-related MDL have been granted limited discovery into PrivatBank’s U.S. securities activities from 1992‑1998, suggesting possible financial links between a foreign bank and the United States during the period surrounding the attacks. While the document does not name specific transactions or individuals, it opens a legal avenue to probe foreign financial flows that could intersect with terrorism financing, making it a moderate‑value lead for further investigation. Key insights: PrivatBank’s 2001 annual report states it dealt in U.S. securities, establishing a basis for general jurisdiction.; Court ordered jurisdictional discovery on PrivatBank’s “continuous and systematic” U.S. contacts from 1992‑1998.; Discovery could uncover financial transactions that overlap with the timeframe of the September 11 attacks.

1p
House OversightSep 4, 2015

Sparse text referencing a Las Vegas Strip development site

Sparse text referencing a Las Vegas Strip development site The passage contains only fragmented, non-contextual fragments with no identifiable actors, transactions, dates, or allegations. It provides no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Mentions a development site on the Las Vegas Strip; Contains no names, dates, or financial details

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.