Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Speculative account of Snowden's movements and alleged foreign intelligence involvement in Hong Kong
Case File
kaggle-ho-020337House Oversight

Speculative account of Snowden's movements and alleged foreign intelligence involvement in Hong Kong

Speculative account of Snowden's movements and alleged foreign intelligence involvement in Hong Kong The passage offers a narrative with no concrete evidence, dates, or documented transactions. It repeats known public allegations about Snowden and does not provide actionable leads, new documents, or verifiable connections to high‑level officials beyond generic references to Putin and the CIA. Key insights: Claims CIA Deputy Director Morell reviewed Snowden case on an Obama‑appointed panel.; Alleges Russian President Putin personally contacted diplomats in Hong Kong regarding Snowden.; Suggests Chinese intelligence could have tracked Snowden via security‑clearance databases and Hong Kong police informants.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-020337
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Speculative account of Snowden's movements and alleged foreign intelligence involvement in Hong Kong The passage offers a narrative with no concrete evidence, dates, or documented transactions. It repeats known public allegations about Snowden and does not provide actionable leads, new documents, or verifiable connections to high‑level officials beyond generic references to Putin and the CIA. Key insights: Claims CIA Deputy Director Morell reviewed Snowden case on an Obama‑appointed panel.; Alleges Russian President Putin personally contacted diplomats in Hong Kong regarding Snowden.; Suggests Chinese intelligence could have tracked Snowden via security‑clearance databases and Hong Kong police informants.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightedward-snowdennsaciarussiachina

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
185 adversary services, which also had the home court advantage, from stepping in. He also gave adversaries an ample, if not wholly irresistible reason, to enter the game by saying that he had access to NSA’s sources in China. How could they resist such a prize? As confidant as Snowden may have been that he was in control, the CIA believed that confidence was misinformed. CIA Deputy Director Morell said, after reviewing the case on a panel appointed by President Obama: “Snowden thinks he is smart, but he was never in a position in his previous jobs to fully understand the immense capabilities of our Russian and Chinese counterparts.” He could adopt a self-confident tone in his post-mortem conversations with journalists in Moscow, but he had no means to block the efforts of the Chinese or Russian services in Hong Kong. These intelligence services had no restrictions on their actions. For example, the Chinese intelligence service could have spotted him on his arrival in Hong Kong simply by cross- checking its aforementioned database of US intelligence workers who had applied for a renewed security clearance in the past three years. It could have pinpointed his whereabouts through its informant network in the Hong Kong Police and the security staffs of hotels. Snowden’s mysterious “carer” would not be immune from detection by that network. Russia, China’s longtime intelligence ally, would not even need to go to such lengths since, as Putin gloatingly confirmed, he contacted its diplomats in Hong Kong. The Russian intelligence service would them swing into action while Russian “diplomats” entered into talks with him. The Russians would also glean from Snowden’s request for asylum that Hong Kong was only a temporary stopover for him, “The purpose of my [Hong Kong} mission was to get the information to journalists,” he would tell the Guardian after he was safely ensconced in Moscow. After that brief mission, he was “done” in Hong Kong. Where he planned to go next, mainland China was only a taxi ride away and there was a direct flight to Moscow. Snowden does not say how many days he planned to be in Hong Kong, but he indicated that he was working under a tight clock. The time pressure resulted in him emailing Gellman at the Washington Post an ultimatum on May 24, 2013: either Gellman publish the selected documents in the Washington Post within 72 hours or he would lose the exclusive scoop. He wanted the story to break on May 27 2013 without his true identity (which Gellman did not know). Hid identity would be known to a foreign mission in Hong Kong if Gellman acceded to his demands. Since as previously mentioned, Gellman’s story would enclose an encoded signal he planned to use as proof of his bona fides. So even before the Guardian reporters had agreed to come to Hong Kong, he had plans to deal with a foreign mission. But he planned to keep his name out of it. Instead, he insisted Gellman include in it a coded signal in it. When the Washington Post turned down his ultimatum, he needed a different plan. Time was running out if he was to break the story and leave Hong Kong before the NSA realized he was missing. At best, he was safe until June 3“. That was when he was supposed to return from his two-week medical leave for getting treatment for epilepsy. But if he failed to show up in Hawaii on June 3, alarm bells at the NSA would go off. It would not take long to find him. Airline record would show that he had flown to Hong Kong. The NSA security staff would ask questions, as Snowden explained from Moscow: “This guy isn’t where he says he’s supposed to be. He’s supposed to be getting medical treatment. Why the hell is he in Hong Kong?” It would then determine he had lied about his medical treatment, and it would immediate go after him with the full power of the U.S. government.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

NSA leadership resignation and alleged oversight failures during Snowden era

NSA leadership resignation and alleged oversight failures during Snowden era The passage references known events – General Alexander's resignation and President Obama's handling of the NSA leadership after Snowden – without providing new specifics, documents, or actionable leads. It mentions high‑level officials but adds no fresh details, financial flows, or misconduct allegations that could be pursued. Key insights: General Keith Alexander resigned on June 30, 2013 amid the Snowden disclosures.; President Obama reportedly asked Alexander to stay on for six more months before appointing Michael Rogers.; A 2013 review committee allegedly found catastrophic failures in NSA defenses.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Snowden’s alleged acquisition of the 2013 Black Budget and its potential value to foreign intelligence services

Snowden’s alleged acquisition of the 2013 Black Budget and its potential value to foreign intelligence services The passage suggests Snowden stole a highly classified Congressional Budget Justification (the 2013 black budget) that details intelligence priorities and funding across multiple agencies. It claims the document would be valuable to adversary nations such as Russia’s SVR, implying a possible financial or strategic motive beyond whistleblowing. This provides a concrete lead (specific document, fiscal year, agencies) and ties to high‑level actors (NSA, CIA, President, Congress) and foreign intelligence services, making it a strong investigative angle, though the claim is unverified and relies on secondary commentary. Key insights: Snowden allegedly took the 2013 Congressional Budget Justification (black budget) while at Booz Allen.; The document lists funding and priorities for NSA, CIA, DIA, NRO, and other agencies.; Former CIA deputy director Michael Morell is quoted saying the SVR would pay millions for such a document.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Passage discusses Snowden disclosures, intelligence oversight, and historical examples of public denial

Passage discusses Snowden disclosures, intelligence oversight, and historical examples of public denial The text provides general commentary on intelligence secrecy, Snowden’s leaks, and historical perception biases without offering concrete new leads, specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable investigative angles. It reiterates known public statements and widely reported events, offering little novel or actionable information for further investigation. Key insights: Mentions NSA documents leaked by Snowden covering military plans and weapons systems.; Notes that House and Senate Intelligence Committee members were briefed on Snowden’s actions.; Cites James D. Clapper’s false public statement to Senator Ron Wyden about NSA data collection.

1p
House OversightUnknown

General Michael Hayden suggests Snowden may have had assistance from a competent source

General Michael Hayden suggests Snowden may have had assistance from a competent source The passage cites a former top intelligence official (Michael Hayden) implying that Edward Snowden acted with help, hinting at a possible undisclosed collaborator. While no names, dates, or transactions are provided, the claim links a high‑ranking former NSA/CIA director to a major intelligence breach, offering a concrete lead for further inquiry into who might have assisted Snowden. Key insights: General Michael Hayden publicly speculated that Snowden did not act alone.; Hayden describes the hypothetical helper as "very competent" in espionage matters.; The text draws parallels between whistle‑blowers and ideological spies, suggesting financial incentives could be involved.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Allegations of Russian SVR targeting NSA Tor operations and possible insider

Allegations of Russian SVR targeting NSA Tor operations and possible insider The passage offers vague, unverified claims about Russian intelligence attempting to break Tor and seeking an NSA insider, but provides no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable evidence. It is largely speculative and repeats known public concerns about Tor surveillance, offering limited investigative value. Key insights: Claims that Russian SVR pursued tools to break Tor and offered a bounty to hackers.; Alleged mapping of Tor exit nodes, including one linked to Snowden in Hawaii.; Suggestion that an NSA contractor may have been compromised by SVR.

1p
House OversightUnknown

NSA leadership change after Snowden cited as chain‑of‑command failure

NSA leadership change after Snowden cited as chain‑of‑command failure The passage repeats known facts about General Alexander’s resignation and Admiral Rogers’ appointment during the Snowden fallout, offering no new specifics, dates beyond public record, or actionable leads. It mentions President Obama but adds no novel insight or evidence of misconduct. Key insights: General Alexander resigned on June 30, 2013 amid Snowden revelations; President Obama asked him to stay on for six more months before replacement; Admiral Michael Rogers was appointed as new NSA director

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.