Oliver Stone allegedly paid $1 million to Snowden’s lawyer for “total access” and $700 k to the Guardian for Snowden film rights
Oliver Stone allegedly paid $1 million to Snowden’s lawyer for “total access” and $700 k to the Guardian for Snowden film rights The passage claims specific payments by a high‑profile filmmaker to a Russian attorney and to a major newspaper to obtain privileged access to Edward Snowden and related material. It names concrete amounts, parties, and a potential conduit for undisclosed information, which could merit a financial‑flow and foreign‑influence investigation. While the claim is unverified and lacks corroborating documents, it ties together influential cultural figures, a Russian lawyer, and a U.S. media outlet, making it a moderately strong lead. Key insights: Stone allegedly paid $700,000 to The Guardian for rights to Luke Harding’s “The Snowden File.”; Stone allegedly paid $1 million to Anatoly Kucherena, Snowden’s Moscow lawyer, for “total access.”; The payment is described as unrelated to Kucherena’s novel, suggesting a different purpose.
Summary
Oliver Stone allegedly paid $1 million to Snowden’s lawyer for “total access” and $700 k to the Guardian for Snowden film rights The passage claims specific payments by a high‑profile filmmaker to a Russian attorney and to a major newspaper to obtain privileged access to Edward Snowden and related material. It names concrete amounts, parties, and a potential conduit for undisclosed information, which could merit a financial‑flow and foreign‑influence investigation. While the claim is unverified and lacks corroborating documents, it ties together influential cultural figures, a Russian lawyer, and a U.S. media outlet, making it a moderately strong lead. Key insights: Stone allegedly paid $700,000 to The Guardian for rights to Luke Harding’s “The Snowden File.”; Stone allegedly paid $1 million to Anatoly Kucherena, Snowden’s Moscow lawyer, for “total access.”; The payment is described as unrelated to Kucherena’s novel, suggesting a different purpose.
Tags
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.