Skip to main content
Skip to content
Testimony hints at undisclosed allegations of Alan Dershowitz abusing a minor beyond known victim [REDACTED - Survivor]Witness invokes attorney-client and common interest privilege during House oversight hearing

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Transcript excerpt discussing attorney common‑interest privilege in the CVRA case
Case File
kaggle-ho-021858House Oversight

Transcript excerpt discussing attorney common‑interest privilege in the CVRA case

Transcript excerpt discussing attorney common‑interest privilege in the CVRA case The passage merely records a procedural question about whether any attorneys shared a common‑interest privilege in a civil case (CVRA) involving a person named [REDACTED - Survivor]. It contains no concrete names of powerful officials, financial transactions, or actionable leads. The content is routine legal discussion and offers minimal investigative value. Key insights: Question about whether any attorneys shared a common‑interest privilege with counsel in the CVRA case as of Dec 30 2014.; Reference to a co‑counsel, Mr. Edwards, and an accountant‑interest agreement.; Mentions [REDACTED - Survivor] and her attorneys, but no substantive allegations.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-021858
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Transcript excerpt discussing attorney common‑interest privilege in the CVRA case The passage merely records a procedural question about whether any attorneys shared a common‑interest privilege in a civil case (CVRA) involving a person named [REDACTED - Survivor]. It contains no concrete names of powerful officials, financial transactions, or actionable leads. The content is routine legal discussion and offers minimal investigative value. Key insights: Question about whether any attorneys shared a common‑interest privilege with counsel in the CVRA case as of Dec 30 2014.; Reference to a co‑counsel, Mr. Edwards, and an accountant‑interest agreement.; Mentions [REDACTED - Survivor] and her attorneys, but no substantive allegations.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightlegal-procedureattorney-privilegecivil-litigation
View on oversight.house.gov

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 35 knowledge, he can answer that question, because I assume none of the lawyers within the common interest privilege had that direct knowledge. MR. SIMPSON: I'm asking -- for the purpose of the questions I'm putting aside Virginia Roberts and I'm putting aside her attorneys. MR. SCAROLA: Attorneys. MR. SIMPSON: Attorneys. MR. SCAROLA: Attorneys. MR. SIMPSON: Yes. MR. SCAROLA: Not just Virginia Roberts' attorneys, but any attorney sharing a common interest privilege? MR. SIMPSON: No. No. MR. SCAROLA: Okay. Well I'm not going to let him -- BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. Let me is ask this: As of December 30th, 2014, were there any attorneys who were sharing a common interest privilege with you as counsel in the CVRA case? Had you entered into an agreement with any other attorney? You have co-counsel, Mr. Edwards. MS. McCAWLEY: Well, to the extent that's going to reveal privileged information about accountant interest agreement, I am not going to ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.