Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Congressional hearing excerpt questioning knowledge of Alan Dershowitz abuse allegations
Case File
kaggle-ho-021864House Oversight

Congressional hearing excerpt questioning knowledge of Alan Dershowitz abuse allegations

Congressional hearing excerpt questioning knowledge of Alan Dershowitz abuse allegations The passage references a line of questioning about alleged minor abuse by Alan Dershowitz and mentions a potential witness, [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it hints at possible undisclosed witnesses, it lacks concrete details such as dates, transactions, or direct involvement of high‑level officials. The lead is of moderate investigative interest but offers limited actionable information and involves a figure who, although prominent, is not a top government official. Key insights: Questioning whether any witness besides [REDACTED - Survivor] could attest to Alan Dershowitz's alleged abuse.; Witnesses may exist but require further discovery.; The exchange occurred on December 30, 2014, during a privileged hearing.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-021864
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Congressional hearing excerpt questioning knowledge of Alan Dershowitz abuse allegations The passage references a line of questioning about alleged minor abuse by Alan Dershowitz and mentions a potential witness, [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it hints at possible undisclosed witnesses, it lacks concrete details such as dates, transactions, or direct involvement of high‑level officials. The lead is of moderate investigative interest but offers limited actionable information and involves a figure who, although prominent, is not a top government official. Key insights: Questioning whether any witness besides [REDACTED - Survivor] could attest to Alan Dershowitz's alleged abuse.; Witnesses may exist but require further discovery.; The exchange occurred on December 30, 2014, during a privileged hearing.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightlegal-testimonysexual-misconduct-allegationwitness-discoveryprivilege

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 4l A. Yes. Q. Okay. Because of the privilege instruction, I'm going to ask it this way: As of December 30th, 2014, when you put your -- allowed your name to be put on this pleading as -- A. I didn't allow it. I was proud to sign this pleading. Q. Okay. As of December 30th, 2014, when you were proud to sign this pleading, was there any witness, whether a victim or anyone else, who could be -- person, whether a victim or anyone else, who could be called as a witness who would say, I have knowledge that Alan Dershowitz abused a minor, other than Virginia Roberts? A. I believe with further discovery we could have identified witnesses, yes. Q. So is the answer to my question, no, when I ask: As of December 30th, 2014, when you signed this, were you aware of a single witness who would testify, I have knowledge that Alan Dershowitz abused a minor, other than Virginia Roberts? MS. McCAWLEY: Objection. I just want to be clear. Outside the context of Virginia Roberts, what he learned through the common interest privilege. BY MR. SIMPSON: ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Related Documents (6)

House OversightApr 17, 2019

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specific actions (e.g., alleged drafting of the NPA, defamatory statements, settlement confidentiality) and dates that could be pursued for documentary evidence, witness interviews, and financial‑flow analysis. If substantiated, the lead would expose potential prosecutorial misconduct and high‑level collusion, generating major public outrage. Key insights: Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz.; Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded Epstein and co‑conspirators.; Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved the NPA; later became Trump’s Secretary of Labor.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court The filing reveals a procedural move by a high‑profile attorney to access testimony from [REDACTED - Survivor], a key witness in the Epstein‑related allegations. While it connects a well‑known lawyer to the case, it offers no new factual disclosures, financial flows, or direct involvement of senior officials. The lead is moderately useful for tracking litigation strategy but lacks novel or explosive content. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a motion to lift a confidentiality seal on a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor].; The motion was filed on Feb 3 2016, referencing a Jan 12 2016 confidentiality order.; Dershowitz argues the need to share the testimony with expert witnesses and other parties for his defense.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Deposition testimony reveals attorney knowingly filed 2014 pleading accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of sexual abuse

Deposition testimony reveals attorney knowingly filed 2014 pleading accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of sexual abuse The passage provides a direct quotation from an attorney confirming that a December 30, 2014 filing was the first public allegation against Prince Andrew and Professor Alan Dershowitz. It identifies specific clients (S.R., E.W., L.M., M., B.) and mentions prior deposition requests linking Dershowitz to Jeffrey Epstein. While the names are high‑profile, the information largely restates already public allegations and does not disclose new documents, financial flows, or undisclosed communications, limiting its investigative novelty. Key insights: Attorney confirms the 12/30/2014 filing accused Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of sexual abuse.; The filing was the first public allegation by the attorney on behalf of any client.; Attorney acknowledges prior deposition requests (2009, 2011) that referenced Dershowitz’s alleged presence with Epstein and underage girls.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures

The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s

17p
House OversightNov 23, 2015

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it identifies a potential lead—unsealing these records could provide evidence of misconduct—it lacks concrete details such as dates of alleged abuse, financial transactions, or direct links to powerful political figures. The controversy is moderate, and the novelty is limited given the public nature of the Dershowitz‑Giuffre allegations. Key insights: Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep records confidential.; The contested records are three filings that recount [REDACTED - Survivor]’s allegations of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz.; Plaintiffs argue the filings are not confidential and should be part of the public record in the defamation case.

1p
House OversightMar 20, 2017

Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz

Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz The documents contain multiple sworn statements, media excerpts, and court orders that reference alleged sexual encounters between [REDACTED - Survivor] (Jane Doe 3) and Prince Andrew, as well as accusations against Alan Dershowitz. While many of the claims have been publicly reported, the filing includes sealed exhibits and specific procedural motions (Rule 21/15) that could provide new evidentiary leads, such as the referenced sealed documents and the alleged list of other powerful individuals (politicians, business executives, foreign leaders). The presence of a judge’s order striking certain allegations and the detailed procedural history suggest actionable avenues for further discovery and verification. Key insights: Exhibits list media articles linking Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to alleged sexual abuse of a minor.; Court order strikes detailed allegations but preserves the right of Jane Doe 3 to reassert them with proper evidence.; Reference to a “list of numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well‑known Prime Minister, and other world leaders” in the Rule 21 motion.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.