Duplicate Document
This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:
Congressional hearing excerpt questioning alleged minor abuse by Alan DershowitzCongressional hearing excerpt questioning alleged minor abuse by Alan Dershowitz
Congressional hearing excerpt questioning alleged minor abuse by Alan Dershowitz The passage references a potentially explosive allegation involving a high‑profile attorney, but provides no concrete evidence, names of witnesses, dates, or documents. It suggests a line of inquiry that could be pursued, yet the lead is vague and unverified, limiting immediate investigative utility. Key insights: Question posed about whether anyone reported Alan Dershowitz abusing minors.; Reference to a refusal to answer regarding 'Miss Roberts' and attorney‑client privilege invoked.; Date mentioned: December 30, 2014, indicating the timeframe of the inquiry.
Summary
Congressional hearing excerpt questioning alleged minor abuse by Alan Dershowitz The passage references a potentially explosive allegation involving a high‑profile attorney, but provides no concrete evidence, names of witnesses, dates, or documents. It suggests a line of inquiry that could be pursued, yet the lead is vague and unverified, limiting immediate investigative utility. Key insights: Question posed about whether anyone reported Alan Dershowitz abusing minors.; Reference to a refusal to answer regarding 'Miss Roberts' and attorney‑client privilege invoked.; Date mentioned: December 30, 2014, indicating the timeframe of the inquiry.
Persons Referenced (3)
“-- what I'm talking about is people who could be witnesses, people who saw things, people did things, heard”
Jack Scarola“Alan Dershowitz had abused any other minors? MR. SCAROLA: I'm going to instruct you not to answer that que”
Alan Dershowitz“owledge of admissible evidence told you that Alan Dershowitz had abused any other minors? MR. SCAROLA: I'm go”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Deposition testimony reveals attorney knowingly filed 2014 pleading accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of sexual abuse
Deposition testimony reveals attorney knowingly filed 2014 pleading accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of sexual abuse The passage provides a direct quotation from an attorney confirming that a December 30, 2014 filing was the first public allegation against Prince Andrew and Professor Alan Dershowitz. It identifies specific clients (S.R., E.W., L.M., M., B.) and mentions prior deposition requests linking Dershowitz to Jeffrey Epstein. While the names are high‑profile, the information largely restates already public allegations and does not disclose new documents, financial flows, or undisclosed communications, limiting its investigative novelty. Key insights: Attorney confirms the 12/30/2014 filing accused Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of sexual abuse.; The filing was the first public allegation by the attorney on behalf of any client.; Attorney acknowledges prior deposition requests (2009, 2011) that referenced Dershowitz’s alleged presence with Epstein and underage girls.
Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...
The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive
BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Hard Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Crimes, but Flight Logs and Lawyer Claims Provide Leads
BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Hard Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Crimes, but Flight Logs and Lawyer Claims Provide Leads The passage summarizes a detailed review of over 2,000 pages of court filings that confirm Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's jet multiple times and that attorneys have attempted to use Clinton's connection in lawsuits. While it concludes there is no concrete proof of sexual misconduct, it identifies specific leads – flight logs, attorney Jack Scarola’s threats, alleged settlement negotiations involving Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr, and pending lawsuits by [REDACTED - Survivor] – that merit further investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Clinton appears on 13 flight logs for Epstein's private 727 between 2002‑2003, often with Epstein aide Sarah Kellen and Clinton aide Doug Band.; Attorney Jack Scarola warned of "extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure" when asked for proof linking Clinton.; [REDACTED - Survivor]' lawsuit alleges Epstein forced her sexual exploitation by "adult male peers" including high‑level figures; she claims Clinton was present on Little St. James Island but later recanted sexual claims against him.
Allegations that Alan Dershowitz Provided Incomplete or Falsified Flight Logs to Law‑Enforcement in the Jeffrey Epstein Investigation
The passage supplies concrete, time‑stamped allegations that a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) selectively produced flight‑log records covering Jan‑Sep 2005 while omitting an Oct 2005 log, and Selective production of flight logs covering Jan‑Sep 2005, excluding an Oct 2005 log. Inconsistencies between Dershowitz‑provided logs and pilot Dave Rogers’ logs. Testimony that the logs may have be
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure
Dershowitz Seeks Intervention in Epstein Victims’ CVRA Case, Citing Alleged False Accusations Involving Clinton, Gore, and Prince Andrew
The filing outlines a contested claim that Alan Dershowitz was defamed in a victim‑rights case and references unverified allegations that former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore, Dershowitz argues the allegations against him were fabricated and surfaced only in a 2014 joinder mo The brief cites Jane Doe #3’s sworn statements claiming Bill Clinton and Al Gore were on Epstein’s
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.