Anecdotal commentary on university course requirements and alleged faculty lobbying

Anecdotal commentary on university course requirements and alleged faculty lobbying The passage contains personal anecdotes about university curriculum decisions with no specific names, dates, financial transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to misconduct. It lacks verifiable claims or novel information relevant to investigations. Key insights: Claims that art history and math departments lobby to make courses required to protect their own programs.; Allegation that Northwestern classified linguistics as a math course to preserve the department.; Mention of unnamed MIT professors described as 'superstars' whose lectures are incomprehensible to the author.