Testimony Claims No Interstate Communication or Coercion in Jeffrey Epstein Case, Suggesting Prosecutorial Misconduct

Summary

Testimony Claims No Interstate Communication or Coercion in Jeffrey Epstein Case, Suggesting Prosecutorial Misconduct The passage provides specific deposition excerpts and names of alleged victims and a former law partner, alleging that federal prosecutors mischaracterized evidence to secure a deferred prosecution agreement. This offers a concrete lead for investigating prosecutorial conduct, but the claims are unverified and lack direct evidence of higher‑level officials or financial flows, limiting the score to the strong‑lead range. Key insights: Depositions of Tatum Miller, Brittany Beale, Saige Gonzalez, and Jennifer Ladude assert no interstate communications meeting §2422(b) requirements.; Victims allegedly lied about their ages to gain access to Epstein’s home.; Testimony states no sexual coercion, force, drugs, or alcohol were involved.