Alleged Prosecutorial Leaks and Potential Misconduct in Federal Epstein Case

Summary

Alleged Prosecutorial Leaks and Potential Misconduct in Federal Epstein Case The passage suggests possible improper disclosure of confidential investigation details by federal prosecutors to the press, implicating senior DOJ officials in a high‑profile sexual abuse case. While it provides specific names and actions that merit follow‑up, the claims are anecdotal and lack concrete evidence of financial transactions or direct political influence, limiting the score to the strong‑lead range. Key insights: Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein allegedly disclosed confidential plea‑negotiation details and statutory theory to NYT reporter Landon Thomas.; First Assistant Sloman reportedly defended the leak as “non‑case specific,” a claim contradicted by the reporter’s notes.; U.S. Attorney Acosta was said to have authority to decline prosecution, raising questions about discretionary abuse.