Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Algorithmic trading memo references speculative market shocks tied to political events
Case File
kaggle-ho-026012House Oversight

Algorithmic trading memo references speculative market shocks tied to political events

Algorithmic trading memo references speculative market shocks tied to political events The passage primarily discusses a trading algorithm’s performance and risk parameters, with only vague mentions of political events (e.g., a FOX News story about an FBI investigation) that lack concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It offers minimal investigative value and no novel, verifiable connections to powerful actors. Key insights: Mentions potential market volatility from terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and political news.; References a speculative FOX News story about an FBI renewal investigation involving Clinton and speculation on Trump.; Provides detailed algorithmic performance metrics but no direct link to any high‑profile individual or entity.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-026012
Pages
1
Persons
15
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Algorithmic trading memo references speculative market shocks tied to political events The passage primarily discusses a trading algorithm’s performance and risk parameters, with only vague mentions of political events (e.g., a FOX News story about an FBI investigation) that lack concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It offers minimal investigative value and no novel, verifiable connections to powerful actors. Key insights: Mentions potential market volatility from terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and political news.; References a speculative FOX News story about an FBI renewal investigation involving Clinton and speculation on Trump.; Provides detailed algorithmic performance metrics but no direct link to any high‑profile individual or entity.

Persons Referenced (15)

Donald Trump

igation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U.S. elections. The Brexit day exam

Eric Trump

igation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U.S. elections. The Brexit day exam

Jane Does

y algorithm buys a long contract every minute and does not hold short contracts can be estimated in the

Blaine Trump

igation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U.S. elections. The Brexit day exam

Melania Trump

igation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U.S. elections. The Brexit day exam

Bill Clinton

FOX News releasing FBI renewal investigation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U

Robert Trump

igation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U.S. elections. The Brexit day exam

Chelsea Clinton

FOX News releasing FBI renewal investigation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U

Ivanka Trump

igation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U.S. elections. The Brexit day exam

Unit Manager

andidate and a prospective algorithmic hedge-fund manager | cannot say investing even in T-Bills is 100% sa

Marc Rich

t 10 cents in 2 minutes and jumped back. Many got rich and many got poor for 120 seconds while in their

Adam Back

ropped for about 10 cents in 2 minutes and jumped back. Many got rich and many got poor for 120 seconds

Ivana Trump

igation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U.S. elections. The Brexit day exam

Estate Manager

andidate and a prospective algorithmic hedge-fund manager | cannot say investing even in T-Bills is 100% sa

Hillary Clinton

FOX News releasing FBI renewal investigation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightalgorithmic-tradingmarket-volatilitypolitical-speculationfinancial-risk

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
While this particular example above illustrates good results by the end of the day (+$7,848 and $1,600 maximum drawdown from starting balance), there are certainly markets situations that require large margins and can not be expected beforehand. These are usually terrorist attacks, sudden nature disasters, or even FOX News releasing FBI renewal investigation over Clinton and following speculation on Trump’s lead prior U.S. elections. The Brexit day example is certainly a good case scenario for my algorithm. It provides algorithm with a large volatility and many profitable opportunities. However, there are other large one-side price movements in financial markets that can destroy not only my model, but many other trading strategies if wrong side position is held. In the last month financial markets experienced pound flash-crash in the middle of a random night. GBP/USD dropped for about 10 cents in 2 minutes and jumped back. Many got rich and many got poor for 120 seconds while in their sleep. The only thing that secures investments is responsible trading, which is placing stop losses and not risking more than some percentage per trade. As a CFA Candidate and a prospective algorithmic hedge-fund manager | cannot say investing even in T-Bills is 100% safe and can only say currency trading involves high risk. The only thing | can assure tell you (in my personal opinion) that $10,000 is a lowest safe responsible sum of money needed to operate with the model where $5,000 is used for margin alone and $5,000 is set to be used as a bad case scenario expected drawdown value or a stop loss. P.S. Jeffrey, | want to introduce you to some algorithmic trading concepts and terms needed to understand trading algorithms better. ¢ Algorithmic trading is highly dependent on statistics and averages over a long-term history. ¢ Drawdown — maximal losing dollar amount for open or closed positions from starting balance. ¢ Algorithm ceiling — largest amount of money an algorithm can work with (large trades can influence market conditions against an algorithm). ¢ Percentage of profit and loss trades: 53.99% profit and 46.01% loss trades this summer on a “back-test” e Average profit trade: $20.74 this summer on a “back-test” e Average loss trade: $14.13 this summer on a “back-test” ¢ Number of trades per time period: 45,221 P.P.S. Drawdown value for a condition where price goes down, my algorithm buys a long contract every minute and does not hold short contracts can be estimated in the Excel file attached to the email (Estimation of losing P&L).

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Algorithmic Trading Test Run on Brexit Day Highlights Market Volatility Scenarios

Algorithmic Trading Test Run on Brexit Day Highlights Market Volatility Scenarios The document is a technical description of a trading algorithm's performance during Brexit-related market moves. It mentions public figures (e.g., Fed members, Draghi, Clinton, Trump) only in passing and provides no concrete leads, transactions, or actionable intelligence linking powerful actors to misconduct or financial flows. Key insights: Demonstrates algorithm profit (+$7,848) and drawdown ($1,600) on a simulated Brexit day scenario.; Mentions potential market shocks from terrorist attacks, natural disasters, or media investigations.; Provides back‑test statistics (profit/loss ratio, average trade size, trade count).

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightNov 17, 2018

Chinese Influence & American Interests – Hoover Institution Publication

Chinese Influence & American Interests – Hoover Institution Publication The document contains only a title and publication note with no substantive details, names, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to any controversy. Key insights: Title suggests a focus on Chinese influence and U.S. interests; Published by the Hoover Institution; No specific individuals, dates, or financial information provided

1p
House OversightJan 5, 2018

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content

Document titled “INSIDE THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE” with minimal content The file contains only a title and file identifier with no substantive information, names, dates, transactions, or allegations. It provides no actionable leads or novel insights into any controversial actions or actors. Key insights: File appears to be a placeholder or index page; No mention of individuals, agencies, or financial details

1p
House OversightUnknown

Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution agreement and alleged high‑level connections revealed in multiple Palm Beach filings

Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution agreement and alleged high‑level connections revealed in multiple Palm Beach filings The passage aggregates numerous contemporaneous reports about a secret non‑prosecution agreement that allowed billionaire Jeffrey Epstein to avoid federal charges, mentions specific federal actors (U.S. Attorney's Office, FBI, Assistant U.S. Attorneys), and lists a roster of powerful individuals allegedly on Epstein’s private jet (Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Andrés Pastrana, Lawrence Summers, Ron Burkle, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker). It also cites procedural irregularities, victim exclusion, and potential immunity for co‑conspirators. These details provide concrete leads – names, dates, court actions, and alleged financial flows – that merit further investigation into possible prosecutorial misconduct, quid‑pro quo arrangements, and foreign‑political influence. Key insights: Sealed non‑prosecution agreement between Epstein and U.S. Attorney's Office (2007‑2008) prevented federal charges.; Agreement granted immunity to co‑conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, Nadia Marcinkova.; Victims were not consulted; attorneys claim the deal is unprecedented for an individual.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.